Cited by 21Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTactile and Sensory InteractionsPain Management and Treatment

Chapter 1—restoring vision to the blind: the new age of implanted visual prostheses

Open access

Abstract

Recent Advances in Cortical StimulationThe earliest multielectrode prosthesis for vision was on the surface of a patient's visual cortex in July of 1967, and was an array of flat electrodes, embedded in silicone, and activated wirelessly through transdermal radio transmission (Brindley & Lewin, 1968).This implant demonstrated that electrical stimulation of the visual system could produce light percepts (phosphenes) with reliable location, shape, and size; however, it was inconveniently bulky, required high currents, occasionally caused pain upon stimulation, and was unable to produce sufficient coverage of the visual space for useful http://tvstjournal.org/

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/tvst.3.7.3

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Chuang, A.T., Margo, C.E., & Greenberg, P.B. (2014). Retinal implants: A systematic review. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 98, 852-856.
  2. Hornig, R., Zehnder, T., Velikay-Parel, M., Laube, T., Feucht, M., & Richard, G. (2007). The IMI retinal implant system. In: Humayun, M.S., Weiland, J.D. Chader, G., Greenbaum, E. (Eds.), Artificial sight: Basic research, biomedical engineering, and clinical advances (pp. 111-128). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Science, T. L. I. I. F. I. I. V. S. T. L. I. I. F. I. I. V.
Corresponding author
The Lasker IRRF Initiative for Innovation in Vision Science The Lasker IRRF Initiative for Innovation in Vision Science
Venue
Translational Vision Science & Technology
Published
2014-12
Volume
3
Issue
7
Pages
3
ISSN
2164-2591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4253892072
Cited by
21
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Translational Vision Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
visual prosthesis, cortical stimulation, retinal prosthesis, phosphenes, microelectrode arrays, blindness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review