Cited by 143Connective tissue disorders researchLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Prevalence, injury rate and, symptom frequency in generalized joint laxity and joint hypermobility syndrome in a “healthy” college population

Russek, Leslie N., Errico, Deanna M.·2016·Clinical Rheumatology

Abstract

Generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) and joint hypermobility syndrome (JHS) are gaining increased attention as potential sources of pain and injury. The aims of this study were to evaluate prevalence of GJH and JHS and to determine whether musculoskeletal injuries and symptoms commonly attributed to GJH and JHS were more common within a "healthy" college student population. The study involved a convenience sample of 267 college and graduate students, aged 17-26. GJH was assessed using the Beighton score with a cutoff of 5/9, while JHS was assessed using the Brighton criteria. Injury history and symptoms were assessed by recall. Prevalence of GJH was 26.2 % overall (females 36.7 %, males 13.7 %). Prevalence of JHS was 19.5 % overall (females 24.5 %, males 13.7 %). Injury rates were not significantly different for individuals who had GJH vs. those who did not have GJH. Individuals with JHS were significantly more likely to have had sprains, back pain, and stress fractures. Symptoms were no different between those with GJH and those who did not have GJH. However, individuals with JHS were significantly more likely to report clumsiness, easy bruising, and balance problems than those who did not have JHS. GJH and JHS were relatively common in this healthy college student population; GJH was not associated with increased incidence of injury or symptoms commonly attributed to JHS, but JHS was associated with increased incidence of some injuries and symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10067-015-2951-9

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Russek, L. N., & Errico, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Clarkson University (US)
  • Utica College (US)
Corresponding author
Russek, Leslie N.
Venue
Clinical Rheumatology
Published
2015-05-01
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
1029-1039
ISSN
  • 0770-3198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-9949
OpenAlex
W1963797047
Cited by
143
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
generalized joint hypermobility, joint hypermobility syndrome, prevalence, musculoskeletal injuries, injury rates, symptom frequency, university students, Beighton score, Brighton criteria, sprains, back pain, stress fractures, clumsiness, easy bruising, balance problems
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Joint Instability, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Students, Universities, Prevalence, Range of Motion, Articular, Arthralgia, Young Adult, Symptom Assessment, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review