Cited by 248Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Social reward among juvenile mice

Open access
Panksepp, J. B., Lahvis, G. P.·2007·Genes, Brain and Behavior

Abstract

Mammalian social relationships, such as mother–offspring attachments and pair bonds, can directly affect reproductive output. However, conspecifics approach one another in a comparatively broad range of contexts, so conceivably there are motivations for social congregation other than those underlying reproduction, parental care or territoriality. Here, we show that reward mediated by social contact is a fundamental aspect of juvenile mouse sociality. Employing a novel social conditioned place preference (SCPP) procedure, we demonstrate that social proximity is rewarding for juvenile mice from three inbred strains (A/J, C57BL/6J and DBA/2J), while mice from a fourth strain (BALB/cJ) are much less responsive to social contact. Importantly, this strain‐dependent difference was not related to phenotypic variability in exploratory behavior or contextual learning nor influenced by the genetic background associated with maternal care or social conditioning. Furthermore, the SCPP phenotype was expressed early in development (postnatal day 25) and did not require a specific sex composition within the conditioning group. Finally, SCPP responses resulted from an interaction between two specifiable processes: one component of the interaction facilitated approach toward environments that were associated with social salience, whereas a second component mediated avoidance of environmental cues that predicted social isolation. We have thus identified a genetically prescribed process that can attribute value onto conditions predicting a general form of social contact. To our knowledge, this is the first definitive evidence to show that genetic variation can influence a form of social valuation not directly related to a reproductive behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1601-183x.2006.00295.x

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mice and rats show conditioned preference for places previously paired with social contact.

    “They show conditioned preference for regions previously associated with social contact44”

    From Neural mechanisms of social homeostasis (2019) · cites this paper as [44]

  • Modifications in the conditioned place preference assay have expanded its use to investigate the rewarding properties of prosocial interactions.

    “More recently, modifications in the CPP assay have been made to expand its use to investigate the rewarding properties of prosocial interactions [40,41].”

    From Neural circuits regulating prosocial behaviors (2023) · cites this paper as [40]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sokal RR Rohlf FJ Biometry 1995 3 San Francisco, CA WH Freeman Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Panksepp, J. B., & Lahvis, G. P.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Lahvis, G. P.
Venue
Genes, Brain and Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-11-16
Volume
6
Issue
7
Pages
661-671
ISSN
  • 1601-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1601-1848
OpenAlex
W2088446168
Cited by
248
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 17
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes Brain & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Waisman Center (P30 HD03352)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH018931)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA022543)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32 GM07507, T32GM007507)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD03352., R03HD046716, P30HD003352)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
social reward, juvenile mice, social contact, inbred mouse strains, strain differences, social valuation, social isolation, genetic variation, social behavior, maternal care
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Conditioning, Operant, Female, Food, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Inbred DBA, Motivation, Reward, Sex Characteristics, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Species Specificity, Parenting, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review