Cited by 269Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 155 of the 155 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Candida glabrata: a review of its features and resistance

Open access
Rodrigues, C. F., Silva, S., Henriques, M.·2014·European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Candida species belong to the normal microbiota of the oral cavity and gastrointestinal and vaginal tracts, and are responsible for several clinical manifestations, from mucocutaneous overgrowth to bloodstream infections. Once believed to be non-pathogenic, Candida glabrata was rapidly blamable for many human diseases. Year after year, these pathological circumstances are more recurrent and problematic to treat, especially when patients reveal any level of immunosuppression. These difficulties arise from the capacity of C. glabrata to form biofilms and also from its high resistance to traditional antifungal therapies. Thus, this review intends to present an excerpt of the biology, epidemiology, and pathology of C. glabrata, and detail an approach to its resistance mechanisms based on studies carried out up to the present.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10096-013-2009-3

Cites

155 of 155 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 155 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Helmerhorst EJ, Oppenheim FG (2004) The antifungal mechanisms of antimicrobial proteins. In: Hancock REW, Devine D (eds) Mammalian antimicrobial proteins, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 245–277

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 269

Metadata

Authors
Rodrigues, C. F., Silva, S., & Henriques, M.
Affiliations
Institute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering (PT)
Corresponding author
Henriques, M.
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Published
2013-11-19
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
673-688
ISSN
  • 0934-9723 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-4373
OpenAlex
W2099290964
Cited by
268
References
155
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
Candida glabrata, antifungal resistance, biofilm, candidiasis, bloodstream infection, immunosuppression, fungal pathogenesis, yeast biology
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Candidiasis, Humans, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Candida glabrata

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review