Cited by 66Education, Achievement, and GiftednessMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsMathematics Education and Pedagogy

Consistency, longitudinal stability, and predictions of elementary school students' task interest, success expectancy, and performance in mathematics

Open access
Nuutila, Katariina, Tuominen, Heta, Tapola, Anna, Vainikainen, Mari-Pauliina, Niemivirta, Markku·2018·Learning and Instruction

Abstract

This study examined cross-task consistency and longitudinal stability in elementary school students' task interest, success expectancy, and performance from fourth to sixth grade, and their predictive effects on sixth-grade intrinsic value, self-concept, and achievement in mathematics. The results demonstrated consistency in interest, success expectancy, and performance across tasks and stability over time, and these to predict domain-specific motivation and achievement. Virtually no evidence for reciprocal effects was found for task-specific measures, as only previous task performance predicted change in later success expectancy. Cross-lagged effects were observed, however, for predictions of task motivation and performance on domain-specific motivation and achievement, so that success expectancy predicted intrinsic value, interest predicted self-concept, and task performance predicted both self-concept and achievement. Based on the findings, it would seem that students' task-related motivational experiences are associated with their domain-specific beliefs, and that those, in turn, are to some extent manifested in students' task motivation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.003

Cites

83 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Much research on the reciprocity between motivation and achievement has been done with data collected at large time intervals, reflecting changes over months or years.

    “Another gap in the literature that we identified is that much research on the reciprocity between motivation and achievement has been done with data collected at large time intervals, which reflect changes that happen over months or years (e.g., Harackiewicz et al., 2008;Marsh et al., 2005Marsh et al., , 2016;;Nuutila et al., 2018).”

    From Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Research Agenda (2022) · cites this paper as Nuutila et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ainley, M., & Hidi, S. (2002). Dynamic measures for studying interest and learning. In P. R. Pintrich, & M. L. Maehr (Vol. Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: New directions in measures and methods: Vol. 12, (pp. 43-76). Amsterdam: JAI.
  2. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus user's guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  3. Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and learning. New York/London: Routledge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nuutila, K., Tuominen, H., Tapola, A., Vainikainen, M.-P., & Niemivirta, M.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
  • Nuutila, Katariina
  • Niemivirta, Markku
Venue
Learning and Instruction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
56
Pages
73-83
ISSN
0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2799516204
Cited by
66
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Academy of Finland (287170, 279742)
  • Wihuri Foundation (160423)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
task interest, expectancy of success, mathematics achievement, elementary school students, longitudinal stability, intrinsic value, self-concept, reciprocal effects, cross-lagged effects, task performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review