The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Getting To Outcomes Demonstration and Evaluation: An Illustration of the Prevention Support System
Open accessAbstract
Communities are increasingly being required by state and federal funders to achieve outcomes and be accountable, yet are often not provided the guidance or the tools needed to successfully meet this challenge. To improve the likelihood of achieving positive outcomes, the Getting To Outcomes (GTO) intervention (manual, training, technical assistance) is designed to provide the necessary guidance and tools, tailored to community needs, in order to build individual capacity and program performance. GTO is an example of a Prevention Support System intervention, which as conceptualized by the Interactive Systems Framework, plays a key role in bridging the gap between prevention science (Prevention Synthesis and Translation System) and prevention practice (Prevention Delivery System). We evaluated the impact of GTO on individual capacity and program performance using survey‐ and interview‐based methods. We tracked the implementation of GTO and gathered user feedback about its utility and acceptability. The evaluation of GTO suggests that it can build individual capacity and program performance and as such demonstrates that the Prevention Support System can successfully fulfill its intended role. Lessons learned from the implementation of GTO relevant to illuminating the framework are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The outcomes of capacity building strategies focus on individual and collective self-efficacy and motivation to execute implementation process strategies and on their actual completion (extent, quality, timeliness) of those implementation process strategies [6, 35, 36].”
From Beyond “implementation strategies”: classifying the full range of strategies used in implementation science and practice (2017) · cites this paper as [35]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
Ellis, C., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2074814 · Cited by 29,296
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques
Long, D. R., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1993) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328955 · Cited by 17,625
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,385
Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches
Djamba, Y. K., & Neuman, W. L. (2002) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.2307/3211488 · Cited by 8,853
Statistical Analysis with Missing Data
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119013563 · Cited by 8,473
(2017) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483381411.n168 · Cited by 8,268
Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611 · cited 1×
“Finally, given that behaviors are related to one’s attitudes toward that behavior (Ajzen and Fishbein 1977; Fishbein and Ajzen 1974; 1975), we expected that participation in GTO training and TA would lead the execution of more GTO-related behaviors.”
BackgroundDeming, W. E. (1982) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,297
Health Promotion by Social Cognitive Means
Bandura, A. (2004) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/1090198104263660 · Cited by 7,238
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Backer T. E., 2001, Finding the balance: program fidelity and adaptation in substance abuse prevention: a state-of-the art review
- Fetterman D. M., 2005, Empowerment evaluation principles in practice
- Fishbein M., 1975, Beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research
- Hall G. E., 2001, Implementing change
- Keener D. C., 2005, Empowerment evaluation principles in practice, 73
- Livet M., 2005, Empowerment evaluation principles in practice, 123
- 10.1037/0022-3514.58.3.472 · DOI
- Rapkin B., 2005, Community intervention and AIDS
- Rothman J., 1994, Intervention research: design and development for human services
- Wandersman A., 1999, Results oriented grantmaking and grant implementation
- Yost J., 1998, Empowerment evaluation and results oriented grantmaking in foundations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Quality Implementation Framework: A Synthesis of Critical Steps in the Implementation Process
Meyers, D. C., Durlak, J. A., & Wandersman, A. (2012) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9522-x · Cited by 1,102
Self-citationLeeman, J., Birken, S. A., Powell, B. J., Rohweder, C., & Shea, C. M. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0657-x · Cited by 544
Clarity out of chaos: Use of theory in implementation research
Damschroder, L. J. (2020) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.036 · Cited by 422
Wandersman, A., Chien, V. H., & Katz, J. (2012) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9509-7 · Cited by 422
Self-citationFlaspohler, P., Duffy, J., Wandersman, A., Stillman, L., & Maras, M. A. (2008) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-008-9162-3 · Cited by 306
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chinman, M., Hunter, S. B., Ebener, P., Paddock, S. M., Stillman, L., Imm, P., & Wandersman, A.
- Affiliations
- RAND Corporation (US)
- University of South Carolina (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chinman, Matthew
- Venue
- American Journal of Community Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-02-16
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 206-224
- ISSN
- 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2770
- PMC
- PMC2964843
- OpenAlex
- W1968888222
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 12.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (R06/CCR921459)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA023277)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
- Keywords
- Interactive Systems Framework, prevention science, prevention practices, community-based prevention, program performance, technical assistance, prevention training, program accountability, implementation evaluation, user feedback
- MeSH terms
- Adult, California, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Preventive Health Services, Program Evaluation, Community Networks, Evidence-Based Medicine, Health Care Surveys, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
