The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Getting To Outcomes Demonstration and Evaluation: An Illustration of the Prevention Support System
Open accessAbstract
Communities are increasingly being required by state and federal funders to achieve outcomes and be accountable, yet are often not provided the guidance or the tools needed to successfully meet this challenge. To improve the likelihood of achieving positive outcomes, the Getting To Outcomes (GTO) intervention (manual, training, technical assistance) is designed to provide the necessary guidance and tools, tailored to community needs, in order to build individual capacity and program performance. GTO is an example of a Prevention Support System intervention, which as conceptualized by the Interactive Systems Framework, plays a key role in bridging the gap between prevention science (Prevention Synthesis and Translation System) and prevention practice (Prevention Delivery System). We evaluated the impact of GTO on individual capacity and program performance using survey‐ and interview‐based methods. We tracked the implementation of GTO and gathered user feedback about its utility and acceptability. The evaluation of GTO suggests that it can build individual capacity and program performance and as such demonstrates that the Prevention Support System can successfully fulfill its intended role. Lessons learned from the implementation of GTO relevant to illuminating the framework are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The outcomes of capacity building strategies focus on individual and collective self-efficacy and motivation to execute implementation process strategies and on their actual completion (extent, quality, timeliness) of those implementation process strategies [6, 35, 36].”
From Beyond “implementation strategies”: classifying the full range of strategies used in implementation science and practice (2017) · cites this paper as [35]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
Ellis, C., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2074814 · Cited by 29,296
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques
Long, D. R., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1993) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328955 · Cited by 17,625
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,385
Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches
Djamba, Y. K., & Neuman, W. L. (2002) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.2307/3211488 · Cited by 8,853
Statistical Analysis with Missing Data
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119013563 · Cited by 8,473
(2017) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483381411.n168 · Cited by 8,268
Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611 · cited 1×
“Finally, given that behaviors are related to one’s attitudes toward that behavior (Ajzen and Fishbein 1977; Fishbein and Ajzen 1974; 1975), we expected that participation in GTO training and TA would lead the execution of more GTO-related behaviors.”
BackgroundDeming, W. E. (1982) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,297
Health Promotion by Social Cognitive Means
Bandura, A. (2004) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/1090198104263660 · Cited by 7,238
InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing
Flinders, D. J. (1997) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/s0149-7189(97)89858-8 · Cited by 7,236
McCracken, G. (1988) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412986229 · Cited by 5,220
Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches
Bernard, H. R. (2012) · Cited by 3,524
Gobo, G., & Molle, A. (2017) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781529682847.n12 · Cited by 2,798
Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice
Marraffa, M. (1998) · Iris (Roma Tre University) · Cited by 2,309
Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1974) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0035872 · Cited by 1,404
A Review of Collaborative Partnerships as a Strategy for Improving Community Health
Roussos, S. T., & Fawcett, S. B. (2000) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.369 · Cited by 1,134
Change in schools : facilitating the process
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (1987) · Cited by 1,088
Mechanisms governing empowerment effects: A self-efficacy analysis.
Ozer, E. M., & Bandura, A. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.58.3.472 · Cited by 773
Juran on Leadership For Quality
Juran, J. M. (1989) · Cited by 732
Empowerment evaluation: From principles to practice
Flaspohler, P., Wandersman, A., & Cherniss, C. (2003) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e628672012-221 · Cited by 491
Self-citationProblems of Inference and Proof in Participant Observation
Becker, H. S. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089053 · Cited by 491
Community interventions and effective prevention.
Wandersman, A., & Florin, P. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.6-7.441 · Cited by 444
Self-citationAwareness Contexts and Social Interaction
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1964) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091417 · Cited by 426
From Research to “Best Practices” in Other Settings and Populations
Green, L. W. (2001) · American Journal of Health Behavior · doi:10.5993/ajhb.25.3.2 · Cited by 407
Problems of Inference and Proof in Participant Observations
Becker, H. S. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315129945-35 · Cited by 396
A Developmental Model for Determining Whether the Treatment is Actually Implemented
Hall, G. E., & Loucks, S. F. (1977) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312014003263 · Cited by 355
Levels of Use of the Innovation: A Framework for Analyzing Innovation Adoption
Hall, G. E., Loucks, S. F., Rutherford, W. L., & Newlove, B. W. (1975) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/002248717502600114 · Cited by 351
Evaluating Community-Based Collaborative Mechanisms: Implications for Practitioners
Kreuter, M. W., Lezin, N. A., & Young, L. A. (2000) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/152483990000100109 · Cited by 318
Ennett, S. T., Ringwalt, C. L., Thorne, J., Rohrbach, L. A., Vincus, A., Simons-Rudolph, A., & Jones, S. (2003) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1023/a:1021777109369 · Cited by 276
Intervention Research: Design and Development for Human Service
Thomas, E. J., & Rothman, J. (1994) · Cited by 248
Fighting back against substance abuse
Hallfors, D. D., Cho, H., Livert, D. E., & Kadushin, C. (2002) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00511-1 · Cited by 198
Getting to outcomes: a results-based approach to accountability
Wandersman, A., Imm, P., Chinman, M., & Kaftarian, S. (2000) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/s0149-7189(00)00028-8 · Cited by 192
Self-citationSpoth, R. L., Guyll, M., & Day, S. X. (2002) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol · doi:10.15288/jsa.2002.63.219 · Cited by 172
Chinman, M., Hannah, G., Wandersman, A. H., Ebener, P. A., Hunter, S. B., Imm, P., & Sheldon, J. (2005) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-005-3390-6 · Cited by 171
Self-citationMcCormick, L. K., Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (1995) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/0890-1171-9.3.210 · Cited by 159
Preventing Drug Use among Children and Adolescents: A Research-Based Guide.
Sloboda, Z., & David, S. L. (1997) · Cited by 158
Chinman, M., Imm, P., & Wandersman, A. (2004) · Cited by 132
Self-citationProblems of inference and proof in participant observation
Becker, H. S. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315128498-23 · Cited by 130
O’Brien, K. (1993) · Health Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/109019819302000307 · Cited by 108
Building evaluation capacity in human service organizations: a case study
Stevenson, J. F., Florin, P. R., Mills, D. S., & Andrade, M. (2002) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/s0149-7189(02)00018-6 · Cited by 91
Caulkins, J. P., Everingham, S. S. S., Rydell, C. P., Chiesa, J., & Bushway, S. D. (1999) · RAND Corporation eBooks · doi:10.7249/mr923 · Cited by 90
Building Capacity for Organizational Learning Through Evaluative Inquiry
Preskill, H. S., & Torres, R. T. (1999) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/135638909900500104 · Cited by 89
Outcomes from CSAP's community partnership program: Findings from the national cross-site evaluation
Yin, R. K., Kaftarian, S. J., Yu, P., & Jansen, M. A. (1997) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/s0149-7189(97)00014-1 · Cited by 61
Building Capacity for Organizational Learning Through Evaluative Inquiry
Preskill, H. S., & Torres, R. T. (1999) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/13563899922208814 · Cited by 59
Tabrizinia, S. (2016) · Management Science Letters · doi:10.5267/j.msl.2016.8.005 · Cited by 47
Gillock, K. L., & Reyes, O. (1998) · Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6629(199607)24:3 · Cited by 45
Mitchell, R. E., Stone-Wiggins, B., Stevenson, J. F., & Florin, P. R. (2004) · Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community · doi:10.1300/j005v27n02_05 · Cited by 38
Wandersman, A. (2013) · American Journal of Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1098214013500705 · Cited by 37
Self-citationThe role of technical assistance in the replication of effective HIV interventions.
O’Donnell, L. N., Scattergood, P., Adler, M., Doval, A. S., Barker, M., Kelly, J. A., Kegeles, S. M., Rebchook, G., Adams, J., Terry, M. A., et al. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 33
Getting To Outcomes: a community-based participatory approach to preventive interventions
Chinman, M., Early, D., Ebener, P., Hunter, S., Imm, P., Jenkins, P., Sheldon, J., & Wandersman, A. (2004) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820400011727 · Cited by 25 · cited 2×
“This GTO process is facilitated by the GTO intervention, which has three components: the GTO manual of text and tools published by the RAND Corporation, Getting to Outcomes 2004: Promoting Accountability Through Methods and Tools for Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation (Chinman et al. 2004), face-to-face training…”
MethodSelf-citationEnd Games: The Challenge of Sustainability
Culter, I. (2002) · Cited by 21
Using the Getting to Outcomes (GTO) Model in a Statewide Prevention Initiative
Chinman, M., Imm, P., Wandersman, A., Kaftarian, S. J., Neal, J., Pendleton, K. T., & Ringwalt, C. (2001) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/152483990100200408 · Cited by 19
Self-citationOrganizational Learning and Learning Organizations
(2007) · Knowledge management · doi:10.5040/9798400675980.0005 · Cited by 14
Crosse, S. B., Burr, M., Cantor, D., Hagen, C. A., & Hantman, I. (2002) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e505222006-001 · Cited by 10
Cantor, D., Crosse, S. B., Hagen, C. A., Mason, M. J., Siler, A. J., & von Glatz, A. (2002) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e505242006-001 · Cited by 10
Options for Restructuring the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act
Reuter, P., & Timpane, P. M. (2001) · RAND Corporation eBooks · doi:10.7249/mr1328 · Cited by 3
Setting The Stage For Accountability And Program Evaluation In Community-Based Grant-Making
Crusto, C. A., & Wandersman, A. (2004) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195165005.003.0016 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Backer T. E., 2001, Finding the balance: program fidelity and adaptation in substance abuse prevention: a state-of-the art review
- Fetterman D. M., 2005, Empowerment evaluation principles in practice
- Fishbein M., 1975, Beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research
- Hall G. E., 2001, Implementing change
- Keener D. C., 2005, Empowerment evaluation principles in practice, 73
- Livet M., 2005, Empowerment evaluation principles in practice, 123
- 10.1037/0022-3514.58.3.472 · DOI
- Rapkin B., 2005, Community intervention and AIDS
- Rothman J., 1994, Intervention research: design and development for human services
- Wandersman A., 1999, Results oriented grantmaking and grant implementation
- Yost J., 1998, Empowerment evaluation and results oriented grantmaking in foundations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Quality Implementation Framework: A Synthesis of Critical Steps in the Implementation Process
Meyers, D. C., Durlak, J. A., & Wandersman, A. (2012) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9522-x · Cited by 1,102
Self-citationLeeman, J., Birken, S. A., Powell, B. J., Rohweder, C., & Shea, C. M. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0657-x · Cited by 544
Clarity out of chaos: Use of theory in implementation research
Damschroder, L. J. (2020) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.036 · Cited by 422
Wandersman, A., Chien, V. H., & Katz, J. (2012) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9509-7 · Cited by 422
Self-citationFlaspohler, P., Duffy, J., Wandersman, A., Stillman, L., & Maras, M. A. (2008) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-008-9162-3 · Cited by 306
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chinman, M., Hunter, S. B., Ebener, P., Paddock, S. M., Stillman, L., Imm, P., & Wandersman, A.
- Affiliations
- RAND Corporation (US)
- University of South Carolina (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chinman, Matthew
- Venue
- American Journal of Community Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-02-16
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 206-224
- ISSN
- 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2770
- PMC
- PMC2964843
- OpenAlex
- W1968888222
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 12.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (R06/CCR921459)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA023277)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
- Keywords
- Interactive Systems Framework, prevention science, prevention practices, community-based prevention, program performance, technical assistance, prevention training, program accountability, implementation evaluation, user feedback
- MeSH terms
- Adult, California, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Preventive Health Services, Program Evaluation, Community Networks, Evidence-Based Medicine, Health Care Surveys, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
