Cited by 27School Health and Nursing EducationHealth Policy Implementation ScienceBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Planning for Sustainability of an Evidence‐Based Mental Health Promotion Program in Canadian Elementary Schools

Leadbeater, Bonnie J., Gladstone, Emilie J., Sukhawathanakul, Paweena·2015·American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Substantial research illuminates many factors effecting the implementation of evidence‐based mental health promotion programs in schools; however, research on how schools plan for sustaining their investments in these programs is limited. In this qualitative study, we elicited descriptions of opportunities and challenges for sustainability. We interviewed 24 individuals from schools involved in a longitudinal, qualitative research project that followed uptake and implementation of the evidence‐based WITS Programs across 2 years (Leadbeater et al. 2012). WITS stands for Walk away, Ignore, Talk it out and Seek help and the online WITS Programs focus on preventing peer victimization (www.witsprograms.ca). Our findings suggest that sustainability planning in schools is not merely a next step following high quality implementation, but rather involves multiple ongoing processes that need to be anticipated and supported by school leadership and program champions and developers in order to realize investments in evidence‐based programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10464-015-9737-8

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leadbeater, B. J., Gladstone, E. J., & Sukhawathanakul, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Leadbeater, Bonnie J.
  • Sukhawathanakul, Paweena
Venue
American Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-07-07
Volume
56
Issue
1-2
Pages
120-133
ISSN
  • 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2770
OpenAlex
W846666214
Cited by
27
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Public Health Agency of Canada (Innovation Strategy - Taking Action to Reduce Health Inequalities in Canada, Phase 2)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
program sustainability, mental health promotion, school programs, implementation, school leadership, program champions, elementary school, evidence-based programs
MeSH terms
British Columbia, Canada, Child, Health Promotion, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Mental Health, School Health Services, Schools, Program Evaluation, Qualitative Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review