Cited by 67Gastrointestinal motility and disordersPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsInfant Health and Development

Effect of autogenic training on general improvement in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

Shinozaki, Masae, Kanazawa, Motoyori, Kano, Michiko, Endo, Yuka, Nakaya, Naoki, Hongo, Michio, Fukudo, Shin·2010·Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback

Abstract

Autogenic training (AT) is a useful and comprehensive relaxation technique. However, no studies have investigated the effects of AT on irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). In this study we tested the hypothesis that AT improves symptoms of IBS. Twenty-one patients with IBS were randomly assigned to AT (n = 11, 5 male, 6 female) or control therapy (n = 10, 5 male, 5 female). AT patients were trained intensively, while the control therapy consisted of discussions about patients' meal habits and life styles. All patients answered a question related to adequate relief (AR) of IBS symptoms and four questionnaires: Self-induced IBS Questionnaire (SIBSQ), Self-reported Depression Scale (SDS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and Medical Outcome Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36). The proportion of AR in the last AT session in the AT group (9/11, 81.8%) was significantly higher than that in the controls (3/10, 30.0%, Chi-square test, p = 0.048). Two subscales of the SF-36, i.e., social functioning and bodily pain, were significantly improved in the AT group (p < 0.05) as compared to the control group. Role emotional (p = 0.051) and general health (p = 0.068) showed a tendency for improvement in the AT group. AT may be useful in the treatment of IBS by enhancing self-control.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10484-009-9125-y

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shinozaki, M., Kanazawa, M., Kano, M., Endo, Y., Nakaya, N., Hongo, M., & Fukudo, S.
Affiliations
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • Tohoku University Hospital (JP)
Corresponding author
Fukudo, Shin
Venue
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
Published
2009-12-08
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
189-198
ISSN
  • 0363-3586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1090-0586
  • 1573-3270
OpenAlex
W2020409490
Cited by
67
References
60
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Gastroenterological Association
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (20590693, 22590646)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
autogenic training, irritable bowel syndrome, relaxation training, symptom relief, depression, anxiety, quality of life, self-control, psychosomatic treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety, Autogenic Training, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Chi-Square Distribution, Treatment Outcome, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review