Cited by 1,894Health Policy Implementation SciencePsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health and Patient Involvement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Implementation Research in Mental Health Services: an Emerging Science with Conceptual, Methodological, and Training challenges

Open access
Proctor, Enola K., Landsverk, John, Aarons, Gregory, Chambers, David, Glisson, Charles, Mittman, Brian·2009·Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Abstract

One of the most critical issues in mental health services research is the gap between what is known about effective treatment and what is provided to consumers in routine care. Concerted efforts are required to advance implementation science and produce skilled implementation researchers. This paper seeks to advance implementation science in mental health services by over viewing the emergence of implementation as an issue for research, by addressing key issues of language and conceptualization, by presenting a heuristic skeleton model for the study of implementation processes, and by identifying the implications for research and training in this emerging field.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 85 references

3 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Backer, T. E., David, S. L., & Saucy, G. (Eds.). (1995). Synthesis of behavioral science learnings about technology transfer in reviewing the behavioral science knowledge base on technology transfer. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services.
  2. Blasé, K. A., Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., & Wallace, F. (2005). Operationalizing implementation: Strategies and methods. Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute.
  3. Grimshaw, J. (2007). Improving the scientific basis of health care research dissemination and implementation. Paper presented at NIH Conference on Building the Sciences of Dissemination and Implementation in the Service of Public Health, Washington, DC.
  4. President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. (2003). Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health in America. Final report. Rockville, MD: DHHS Publication.
  5. Proctor, E. K., & Landsverk, J. (2005). Challenges of translating evidence-based treatments into practice contexts and service sectors. Paper presented at The Mental Health Services Research Conference, Washington, DC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,001

Metadata

Authors
Proctor, E. K., Landsverk, J., Aarons, G., Chambers, D., Glisson, C., & Mittman, B.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of California System (US)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Corresponding author
Proctor, Enola K.
Venue
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Published
2008-12-23
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
24-34
ISSN
  • 0894-587X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3289
OpenAlex
W2097206783
Cited by
1,894
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 100 · 2025: 98 · 2024: 142 · 2023: 155 · 2022: 143 · 2021: 227 · 2020: 213 · 2019: 139 · 2018: 112 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 95 · 2013: 83 · 2012: 46
FWCI
50.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p30mh068579-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (5 P30 MH068579, P30-MH-068579, R21MH082731, R25MH080916)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
implementation research, mental health services, implementation process, knowledge-practice gap
MeSH terms
Diffusion of Innovation, Health Services Research, Humans, Mental Health Services, Models, Theoretical, Information Dissemination, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review