Cited by 14Sex work and related issuesHealth Policy Implementation ScienceHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Sustainability of Evidence-Based Practices for HIV Prevention among Female Sex Workers in Mexico

Open access
Palinkas, Lawrence A., Chavarin, Claudia V., Rafful, Claudia M., Um, Mee Young, Mendoza, Doroteo V., Staines, Hugo, Aarons, Gregory A., Patterson, Thomas L.·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined service provider perceptions of requirements for successful sustainment of an efficacious intervention for preventing HIV/AIDS and STIs in female sex workers (FSWs) in Mexico. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 77 leaders and counselors from 12 community-based reproductive health clinics located throughout Mexico participating in a large hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial to scale-up the use of Mujer Segura, a psychoeducational intervention designed to promote condom use and enhance safer sex negotiation skills among FSWs. RESULTS: Five sets of requirements for sustainment were identified: 1) characteristics of the provider, including competence in delivering the intervention, need for continued technical support and assistance from outside experts, and satisfaction with addressing the needs of this population; 2) characteristics of the clients (i.e., FSWs), including client need and demand for services and incentives for participation; 3) characteristics of the organization, including its mission, benefits, and operations; 4) characteristics of the outer setting, including financial support and relationship with the community-based organization's central offices, and transportation and security in areas where FSWs live and work; and 5) outcomes associated with the intervention itself, including a reduction of risk through education and increased outreach through referrals from FSWs who received the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Although the requirements for successful sustainment of interventions like Mujer Segura are consistent with the factors identified in many models of implementation, the results illustrate the importance of local context in assigning priority to these model elements and suggest that the five categories are not discrete entities but interconnected.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0141508

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pearce J, Mann MK, Jones C, van Buschbach S, Olff M, Bisson J. L. The most effective way of deliver- ing a train-the-trainers program. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 2012; 32: 215-226. PMID: 23173243

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palinkas, L. A., Chavarin, C. V., Rafful, C. M., Um, M. Y., Mendoza, D. V., Staines, H., Aarons, G. A., & Patterson, T. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • Mexfam (MX)
  • Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez (MX)
Corresponding author
Palinkas, Lawrence A.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-10-30
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
e0141508
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2229265453
Cited by
14
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH087054)
  • Fogarty International Center (D43TW008633)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sex work and related issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
HIV prevention, female sex workers, intervention sustainability, condom use, safer sex negotiation, psychoeducational intervention, service provider perceptions, STD prevention, Mexico
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Community Health Services, Counseling, Female, Health Personnel, Health Promotion, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Mexico, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Occupational Diseases, Organizations, Women's Health Services, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Program Evaluation, HIV Infections, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Condoms, Safe Sex, Reproductive Health Services, Qualitative Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Sex Workers, Early Medical Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review