Cited by 185Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sexual Compulsivity and Sexual Risk in Gay and Bisexual Men

Open access
Grov, Christian, Parsons, Jeffrey T., Bimbi, David S.·2010·Archives of Sexual Behavior

Abstract

Much of our understanding of the association between the Sexual Compulsivity Scale (SCS) and sexual risk behavior among men who have sex with men (MSM) has been limited to samples of HIV positive MSM only. Using data from a community-based survey of gay and bisexual men (n = 1214), this analysis sought to further evaluate the association between the SCS and sexual risk behavior. The SCS was significantly associated with a variety of sexual risk behaviors, including having sex under the influence of club drugs, engaging in unprotected anal sex (receptive or insertive) with partners of the same and/or different HIV serostatus, identity as a barebacker, intentions to have bareback sex, number of recent sex partners, and temptation for unsafe sex. The SCS was also significantly associated with having engaged in a variety of specialized sexual behaviors (i.e., fetishes), many of which can increase HIV transmission risks. Finally, in multivariate analyses, the SCS significantly predicted unprotected sex with a non-main partner even when controlling for race, HIV serostatus, age, identity as a barebacker, and club drug use. These data indicate that the SCS may be able to serve as an indicator to detect HIV-associated sexual risk behavior in community-based samples of gay and bisexual men.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10508-009-9483-9

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Use of ketamine is common among people with sex addiction.

    “Use of ketamine is also common (Grov et al., 2010)”

    From A motivation model of sex addiction – Relevance to the controversy over the concept (2022) · cites this paper as Grov et al., 2010

    The Results (page unavailable) identify cocaine, MDMA/ecstasy, and methamphetamine—not ketamine—as the most commonly used drugs in the sample. The bivariate Results also report that recent ketamine use was not significantly related to sexual-compulsivity scores. These findings do not support describing ketamine use as common among people with sex addiction. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is a correlation between an individual's score on the sexual compulsivity scale and the tendency to engage in high-risk sexual activities, such as sexual marathons.

    “There is a correlation between an individual's score on the sexual compulsivity scale and the tendency to engage in high-risk sexual activities, such as sexual marathons (Grov et al., 2010).”

    From A motivation model of sex addiction – Relevance to the controversy over the concept (2022) · cites this paper as Grov et al., 2010

    The Introduction ('Sexual Risk Behavior and Men who have Sex with Men'; page unavailable) reports that men who engaged in sexual marathons had higher sexual-compulsivity scores, but that finding concerned HIV-positive men who have sex with men. The Discussion reports an association between SCS scores and sexual risk more generally; the claim leaves out the population limit on the sexual-marathons example. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sexual compulsivity was measured with the Sexual Compulsivity Scale, the most widely published measure among MSM, and scores of 24 and above were defined as indicating sexual compulsivity, consistent with existing literature.

    “Finally, although no official diagnostic criteria for sexual compulsivity existed at the time of our study, we used the Sexual Compulsivity Scale (α = 0.90), the most widely published measure of sexual compulsivity among MSM.45 Consistent with existing literature,17,25,46–49 we defined scores of 24 and above as indicating sexual compulsivity (mean = 17.50; SD = 6.56; range = 10–40).”
  • Individual connections have been demonstrated between sexual compulsivity and many psychosocial problems that have also been identified as syndemic factors related to HIV risk among MSM, such as childhood sexual abuse, depression, and substance use.

    “Researchers have demonstrated individual connections between sexual compulsivity and many of the psychosocial problems that have also been identified as syndemic factors related to HIV risk among MSM, such as childhood sexual abuse, depression, and substance use.17,24–26”
  • Sexual compulsivity is frequently associated with HIV sexual risk behaviors among men who have sex with men.

    “Another factor that has frequently been associated with HIV sexual risk behaviors among MSM is sexual compulsivity.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nanín, J. E., Bimbi, D. S., Brown, J., Severino, J., & Parsons, J. T. (2005, April). Profiles of gay/bisexual men who hengage in specialized sexual behavior. Paper presented at the Western Region Conference of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, San Francisco, CA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Grov, C., Parsons, J. T., & Bimbi, D. S.
Affiliations
  • City University of New York (US)
  • The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
  • LaGuardia Community College (US)
Corresponding author
Parsons, Jeffrey T.
Venue
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Published
2009-03-24
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
940-949
ISSN
  • 0004-0002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2800
OpenAlex
W2038407502
Cited by
185
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32da007233-40)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32DA007233, T32DA07233)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
compulsive sexual behavior, sexual risk behavior, men who have sex with men, gay men, bisexual men, unprotected anal intercourse, barebacking, club drug use, HIV risk factors, sexual fetishes, HIV status
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Bisexuality, Compulsive Behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk-Taking, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, HIV Infections, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Homosexuality, Male, Substance-Related Disorders, Safe Sex, Racial Groups, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review