Cited by 15Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetic diversity and population structure

Ascertainment through family history of disease often decreases the power of family-based association studies

Ferreira, Manuel A. R., Sham, Pak, Daly, Mark J., Purcell, Shaun·2007·Behavior Genetics

Abstract

Selection of cases with additional affected relatives has been shown to increase the power of the case-control association design. We investigated whether this strategy can also improve the power of family-based association studies that use the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT), while accounting for the effects of residual polygenic and environmental factors on disease liability. Ascertainment of parent-offspring trios conditional on the proband having affected first-degree relatives almost always reduced the power of the TDT. For many disease models, this reduction was quite considerable. In contrast, for the same sample size, designs that analyzed more than one affected offspring per family often improved power when compared to the standard parent-offspring trio design. Together, our results suggest that (1) residual polygenic and environmental influences should be considered when estimating the power of the TDT for studies that ascertain families with multiple affected relatives; (2) if trios are selected conditional on having additional affected offspring, then it is important to genotype and include in the analysis the additional siblings; (3) the ascertainment strategy should be considered when interpreting results from TDT analyses. Our analytic approach to estimate the asymptotic power of the TDT is implemented online at http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/ ~purcell/gpc/.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10519-007-9149-0

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An excess of multiplex families relative to population frequencies could substantially diminish the estimated Vm.

    “Various factors could skew this distribution and thus bias downwards the estimated Vm, a notable one being an excess of multiplex families relative to population frequencies (35,36).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferreira, M. A. R., Sham, P., Daly, M. J., & Purcell, S.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Ferreira, Manuel A. R.
Venue
Behavior Genetics
Published
2007-03-20
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
631-636
ISSN
  • 0001-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3297
OpenAlex
W2135678173
Cited by
15
References
14
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
  • National Eye Institute (EY12562, R01EY012562)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
family-based association study, transmission disequilibrium test, case ascertainment, family history of disease, power analysis, parent-offspring trios
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Medical History Taking, Models, Genetic, Nuclear Family, Pedigree, Linkage Disequilibrium, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review