Cited by 47Ethics in Business and EducationGlobal and Cross-Cultural ManagementEthics in medical practice

Convergence in International Business Ethics? A Comparative Study of Ethical Philosophies, Thinking Style, and Ethical Decision-Making Between US and Korean Managers

Paik, Yongsun, Lee, Jong Min, Pak, Yong Suhk·2019·Journal of Business Ethics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-017-3629-9

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 108 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paik, Y., Lee, J. M., & Pak, Y. S.
Affiliations
  • Loyola Marymount University (US)
  • University of Reading (GB)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
Corresponding author
Paik, Yongsun
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2017-07-17
Volume
156
Issue
3
Pages
839-855
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
OpenAlex
W2736128253
Cited by
47
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Korea Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
Keywords
business ethics, ethical decision-making, ethical philosophy, thinking styles, rule utilitarianism, social contract theory, cross-cultural comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review