Cited by 272Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderBehavioral and Psychological StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Interventions to Address the Academic Impairment of Children and Adolescents with ADHD

Raggi, Veronica L., Chronis, Andrea M.·2006·Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

Abstract

There exists a strong link between ADHD and academic underachievement. Both the core behavioral symptoms of ADHD and associated executive functioning deficits likely contribute to academic impairment. Current evidence-based approaches to the treatment of ADHD (i.e., stimulant medication, clinical behavior therapy and classroom behavioral interventions) have demonstrated a robust impact on behavioral variables such as attention and disruptive behavior within classroom analogue settings; however, their efficacy in improving academic outcomes is much less clear. Although surprisingly few treatment outcome studies of ADHD have attempted to incorporate interventions that specifically target academic outcomes, the studies that are available suggest that these interventions may be beneficial. The state of the treatment literature for addressing academic impairment in children and adolescents with ADHD will be reviewed herein, as well as limitations of current research, and directions for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10567-006-0006-0

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neither stimulant medication nor behavioral intervention produces clinically significant academic achievement gains; medication effects are nonsignificant and behavioral effects are small (ES = 0.19).

    “neither approach is associated with clinically significant gains in academic achievement (Langberg & Becker, 2012; Raggi & Chronis, 2006; van der Oord et al., 2008), with nonsignificant changes for medication and small magnitude benefits (ES = 0.19) for behavioral interventions (van der Oord et al., 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raggi, V. L., & Chronis, A. M.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Raggi, Veronica L.
Venue
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
Published
2006-09-14
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
85-111
ISSN
  • 1096-4037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2827
OpenAlex
W2027590037
Cited by
272
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R03MH070666, R34MH073567, R03MH070666-1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, academic impairment, academic underachievement, executive dysfunction, stimulant medication, behavior therapy, treatment outcomes, children and adolescents, attention, disruptive behavior
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Behavior Therapy, Child, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Education, Humans, Peer Group, Teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review