Cited by 204Behavioral and Psychological StudiesAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Enhancing the Effectiveness of Special Education Programming for Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Using a Daily Report Card

Fabiano, Gregory A., Vujnovic, Rebecca K, Pelham, William E., Waschbusch, Daniel A., Massetti, Greta M., Pariseau, Meaghan E., Naylor, Justin, Yu, Jihnhee +4 more·2010·School Psychology Review

Abstract

.Children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) make up a considerable proportion of students who receive special education services in schools. The present study aimed to enhance the outcomes of students with ADHD in special education settings by using a daily report card (DRC). Thirty-three children with ADHD in special education placements were randomly assigned to an intervention condition wherein behavioral consultants worked with the teacher and parent to construct and implement a DRC based on the child’s individualized education plan goals and objectives. These children were compared to 30 children in a business as usual control condition. Results indicated positive effects of the DRC on observations of classroom functioning, individualized education plan goal attainment, and teacher ratings of academic productivity and disruptive behavior in the classroom. Further, a greater percentage of children with ADHD in the DRC group were normalized on measures of disruptive behavior and impairment. The intervention did not result in incremental improvement in academic achievement, teacher ratings of ADHD symptoms or impairment, or the student–teacher relationship. The implications of these results for working with children with ADHD in special education settings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02796015.2010.12087775

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fabiano, G. A., Vujnovic, R. K., Pelham, W. E., Waschbusch, D. A., Massetti, G. M., Pariseau, M. E., Naylor, J., Yu, J., Robins, M., Carnefix, T., Greiner, A. R., & Volker, M.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Fabiano, Gregory A.
Venue
School Psychology Review
Published
2010-01-01
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
219-239
ISSN
  • 0279-6015 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-966X
OpenAlex
W1540415887
Cited by
204
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
FWCI
23.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
School Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, special education, individualized education program, teacher-parent collaboration, disruptive behavior, academic productivity, teacher-student relationship, academic performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review