Cited by 139Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Cumulative Benefits of Secondary School-Based Treatment of Students With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Evans, Steven W., Serpell, Zewelanji N., Schultz, Brandon K., Pastor, Dena A.·2007·School Psychology Review

Abstract

School-based services are well suited for youth with chronic conditions who manifest much of their impairment in the school setting, such as youth with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A significant literature on such programs at the elementary level exists, but little has been developed and tested at the secondary level. The current study is a 3-year treatment outcome study of a school-based training and consultation program for middle school youth with ADHD. Social and academic outcomes for program recipients were compared to that of participants in a community care control group. Findings revealed cumulative long-term benefits for the treatment group as measured by parent ratings of ADHD symptoms and social functioning. Although teacher and parent reports indicated no cumulative academic benefits, within-year analyses suggested a trend toward benefits in student grade point average. Implications for the treatment of ADHD in secondary schools are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02796015.2007.12087943

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In five of the six trials with a non-active control condition (waiting-list control group), participants in the intervention group showed stronger post-treatment improvements in ADHD symptoms compared with participants in the control group.

    “In five of the six trials with a non-active control condition (waiting-list control group), participants in the intervention group showed stronger post-treatment improvements in ADHD-symptoms compared with participants in the control group [62,63,64,65,73,74].”
  • Five studies examined psychosocial interventions provided to students with ADHD in a school setting and eight studies tested psychosocial interventions in a clinical setting.

    “Five studies examined psychosocial interventions provided to students with ADHD in a school setting [62,63,64,65,66] and eight studies tested psychosocial interventions in a clinical setting [67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, S. W., Serpell, Z. N., Schultz, B. K., & Pastor, D. A.
Affiliations
James Madison University (US)
Corresponding author
Evans, Steven W.
Venue
School Psychology Review
Published
2007-06-01
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
256-273
ISSN
  • 0279-6015 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-966X
OpenAlex
W1571188023
Cited by
139
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
School Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, junior high school students, social functioning, educational outcomes, grade point average

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review