Cited by 52Youth Substance Use and School AttendanceAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Augmenting cognitive behavior therapy for school refusal with fluoxetine: a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Melvin, Glenn A., Dudley, Amanda L., Gordon, Michael S., Klimkeit, Ester, Gullone, Eleonora, Taffe, John, Tonge, Bruce J.·2017·Child Psychiatry & Human Development

Abstract

This study investigates whether the augmentation of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) with fluoxetine improves outcomes in anxious school refusing adolescents (11-16.5 years). Sixty-two participants were randomly allocated to CBT alone, CBT + fluoxetine or CBT + placebo. All treatments were well tolerated; with one suicide-attempt in the CBT + placebo group. All groups improved significantly on primary (school attendance) and secondary outcome measures (anxiety, depression, self-efficacy and clinician-rated global functioning); with gains largely maintained at 6-months and 1-year. Few participants were anxiety disorder free after acute treatment. During the follow-up period anxiety and depressive disorders continued to decline whilst school attendance remained stable, at around 54 %. The only significant between-group difference was greater adolescent-reported treatment satisfaction in the CBT + fluoxetine group than the CBT alone group. These results indicate the chronicity of school refusal, and the need for future research into how to best improve school attendance rates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10578-016-0675-y

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Melvin, G. A., Dudley, A. L., Gordon, M. S., Klimkeit, E., Gullone, E., Taffe, J., & Tonge, B. J.
Affiliations
Monash Health (AU)
Corresponding author
Melvin, Glenn A.
Venue
Child Psychiatry & Human Development
Published
2016-08-02
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
485-497
ISSN
  • 0009-398X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3327
OpenAlex
W2488839582
Cited by
52
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4
FWCI
23.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Psychiatry & Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (545968)
  • beyondblue
  • Financial Markets for Children
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
school refusal, cognitive behavioral therapy, fluoxetine, augmentation therapy, adolescents, anxiety disorders, depression, school attendance, treatment satisfaction, self-efficacy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Fluoxetine, Humans, Male, Phobic Disorders, Psychotherapy, Group, Schools, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review