Cited by 59Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Acceptability, satisfaction and perceived efficacy of “ Space from Depression ” an internet-delivered treatment for depression

Open access
Richards, Derek, Murphy, Treasa, Viganó, Noemi, Timulak, Ladislav, Doherty, Gavin, Sharry, John, Hayes, Claire·2016·Internet Interventions

Abstract

Background There are clear advantages to internet-delivered interventions for depression. Users' perspectives on the acceptability, satisfaction, and efficacy of an internet-delivered treatment for depression can inform future developments in the area. Methods Respondents ( n = 281) were participants in an 8 week supported internet-delivered Cognitive Behaviour Therapy treatment for depressive symptoms. Self-report online questionnaires gathered quantitative and qualitative data on the user experience. Principle findings Most respondents were satisfied with the programme ( n = 191), felt supported ( n = 203), reported positive gains and impact resulting from use of the programme, and perceived these to be likely to be lasting effects ( n = 149). Flexibility and accessibility were the most liked aspects. A small number of respondents felt their needs were not met by the intervention ( n = 64); for this group suggestions for improvements centred on the programme's structure and how supporter feedback is delivered. Conclusion Results will deepen the understanding of users' experience and inform the development and implementation of evidence-based internet-delivered interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.invent.2016.06.007

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richards, D., Murphy, T., Viganó, N., Timulak, L., Doherty, G., Sharry, J., & Hayes, C.
Affiliations
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • SilverCloud (Ireland) (IE)
Corresponding author
Richards, Derek
Venue
Internet Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
5
Pages
12-22
ISSN
2214-7829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2462894827
Cited by
59
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3
FWCI
9.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Internet Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, depression, user acceptance, user satisfaction, perceived efficacy, user experience, digital mental health interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review