Cited by 33Occupational Therapy Practice and ResearchPsychiatric care and mental health servicesSchizophrenia research and treatment

Dealing with Real-Life Challenges: Outcome of a Home-Based Occupational Therapy Intervention for People with Severe Psychiatric Disability

Lindström, Maria, Hariz, Gun-Marie, Bernspång, Birgitta·2012·OTJR: Occupational Therapy Journal of Research

Abstract

The authors offered home-based occupational therapy integrated into supported or sheltered housing to help individuals with severe psychiatric disability identify their specific needs of engagement in meaningful daily occupations. This study aimed to evaluate the client outcomes in activities of daily living (ADL) ability and health factors following their participation in occupation-centered interventions in home and community settings. Seventeen participants (7 women) between the ages of 27 and 66 years participated in the intervention project based on the Everyday Life Rehabilitation (ELR). The following instruments were administered before and after the intervention and at a 6-month follow-up: Goal Attainment Scaling, Assessment of Motor and Process Skills, Assessment of Social Interaction, Satisfaction with Daily Occupations, ADL-taxonomy with an effort-scale, and the Symptom Check List-90. Pretest, posttest, and follow-up differences in test scores on goal attainment, occupation, and health-related factors indicate that important progress was made. These findings support the use of the ELR intervention and suggest that larger randomized clinical trials are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3928/15394492-20110819-01

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OT can support recovery as a significant treatment component for patients with SMI through meaningful activities, influencing autonomy in ADL, quality of life and personal well-being.

    “One of these non-pharmacological interventions is occupational therapy (OT), which can support recovery as a significant treatment component of these patients through meaningful activities, influencing aspects such as autonomy in activities of daily living (ADL), quality of life and personal well-being.8–10”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindström, M., Hariz, G.-M., & Bernspång, B.
Affiliations
Umeå University (SE)
Venue
OTJR: Occupational Therapy Journal of Research
Published
2011-08-26
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
5-14
ISSN
  • 1539-4492 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2383
OpenAlex
W2122023337
Cited by
33
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
home-based occupational therapy, supported housing, sheltered housing, activities of daily living, goal achievement, social interaction, symptom severity, client outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review