Cited by 173Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health services

Community-based social interventions for people with severe mental illness: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of recent evidence

Open access
Killaspy, Helen, Harvey, Carol, Brasier, Catherine, Brophy, Lisa, Ennals, Priscilla, Fletcher, Justine, Hamilton, Bridget·2022·World Psychiatry

Abstract

People living with severe mental illness (SMI) are one of the most marginalized groups in society. Interventions which aim to improve their social and economic participation are of crucial importance to clinicians, policy-makers and people with SMI themselves. We conducted a systematic review of the literature on social interventions for people with SMI published since 2016 and collated our findings through narrative synthesis. We found an encouragingly large amount of research in this field, and 72 papers met our inclusion criteria. Over half reported on the effectiveness of interventions delivered at the service level (supported accommodation, education or employment), while the remainder targeted individuals directly (community participation, family interventions, peer-led/supported interventions, social skills training). We identified good evidence for the Housing First model of supported accommodation, for the Individual Placement and Support model of supported employment, and for family psychoeducation, with the caveat that a range of models are nonetheless required to meet the varied housing, employment and family-related needs of individuals. Our findings also highlighted the importance of contextual factors and the need to make local adaptations when "importing" interventions from elsewhere. We found that augmentation strategies to enhance the effectiveness of social interventions (particularly supported employment and social skills training) by addressing cognitive impairments did not lead to transferable "real life" skills despite improvements in cognitive function. We also identified an emerging evidence base for peer-led/supported interventions, recovery colleges and other interventions to support community participation. We concluded that social interventions have considerable benefits but are arguably the most complex in the mental health field, and require multi-level stakeholder commitment and investment for successful implementation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wps.20940

Cites

126 of 126 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emerging evidence indicates that peer involvement in developing and delivering social interventions contributes to positive outcomes.

    “Given emerging evidence that peer involvement in developing and delivering social interventions contributes to positive outcomes (82), this is an important avenue for further development of time use focused interventions.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [5]5. Australian Government Productivity Commission . Mental health inquiry report. Canberra: Productivity Commission, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  2. [8]8. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Mental health, human rights and standards of care. Assessment of the quality of institutional care for adults with psychosocial and intellectual disabilities in the WHO European Region. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  3. [9]9. Care Quality Commission . Mental health rehabilitation inpatient services; ward types, bed numbers and use by clinical commissioning groups and NHS trusts. London: Care Quality Commission, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  4. [18]18. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Psychosis and schizophrenia in adults: prevention and management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. [23]23. Royal Commission into Victoria's Mental Health System . A new approach to mental health and wellbeing in Victoria. Melbourne: Royal Commission into Victoria's Mental Health System, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  6. [27]27. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: a product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Lancaster: Lancaster University, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  7. [112]112. Dalmia S. The ugly truth of Canada's welfare state. The Week, March 23, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  8. [132]132. Royal College of Psychiatrists . Report of the Second Round of the National Audit of Schizophrenia. London: Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership and Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2014. [Google Scholar] Articles from World Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of The World Psychiatric Association

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Killaspy, H., Harvey, C., Brasier, C., Brophy, L., Ennals, P., Fletcher, J., & Hamilton, B.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • Neami National (AU)
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-01-11
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
96-123
ISSN
  • 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-5545
OpenAlex
W4206579320
Cited by
173
References
126
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 8 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
severe mental illness, supported housing, Housing First, supported employment, Individual Placement and Support, family psychoeducation, peer-led intervention, social skills training, community participation, recovery colleges, intervention transferability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review