Cited by 188Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 9 of the 31 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Change in Decentering Mediates Improvement in Anxiety in Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Open access

Abstract

We sought to examine psychological mechanisms of treatment outcomes of a mindfulness meditation intervention for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). We examined mindfulness and decentering as two potential therapeutic mechanisms of action of GAD symptom reduction in patients randomized to receive either mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) or an attention control class (N = 38). Multiple mediation analyses were conducted using a non-parametric cross product of the coefficients approach that employs bootstrapping. Analyses revealed that change in decentering and change in mindfulness significantly mediated the effect of MBSR on anxiety. When both mediators were included in the model, the multiple mediation analysis revealed a significant indirect effect through increases in decentering, but not mindfulness. Furthermore, the direct effect of MBSR on decrease in anxiety was not significant, suggesting that decentering fully mediated the relationship. Results also suggested that MBSR reduces worry through an increase in mindfulness, specifically by increases in awareness and nonreactivity. Improvements in GAD symptoms resulting from MBSR are in part explained by increased levels of decentering. © 2014, Springer Science+Business Media New York.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10608-014-9646-4

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

9 of 31 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 33 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 30
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 14
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
36 of 36
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mediation hypothesis that decentering and mindfulness jointly mediate outcomes in mindfulness-based treatment has not been tested before.

    “Although these studies provide preliminary evidence that decentering might at least partially mediate treatment outcomes, to our knowledge, this mediation hypothesis has not yet been tested nor have decentering and mindfulness been jointly examined as mediators of outcome in a study utilizing mindfulness-based treatment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The psychological mechanisms of mindfulness-based interventions and MBSR specifically are not fully understood.

    “In sum, mindfulness-based interventions are effective in decreasing symptoms in a range of disorders including anxiety disorders, but the psychological mechanisms of mindfulness-based interventions and MBSR specifically are not fully understood.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentt(36) = 4.13reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(36) = 4.13, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(36) = 1.81reported p = .079 · recomputed p = .079

    “t(36)= 1.81, p = .079”

2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 46 references

3 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L. G. M., & Williams, J. B. W. (2002). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I disorders-patient edition (SCID-I/P, 11/2002 revision). New York, NY: Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–185 of 185

Metadata

Authors
Hoge, E. A., Bui, E., Goetter, E., Robinaugh, D. J., Ojserkis, R. A., Fresco, D. M., & Simon, N. M.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Kent State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hoge, Elizabeth A.
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2014-10-14
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
228-235
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W1988619037
Cited by
188
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
16.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Highland Street Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K23AT004432)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
decentering, mindfulness, mindfulness-based stress reduction, generalized anxiety disorder, anxiety reduction, therapeutic mechanisms, worry, non-reactivity, awareness, mediation analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review