Cited by 202Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Group CBT versus MBSR for social anxiety disorder: A randomized controlled trial.

Open access
Goldin, Philippe R., Morrison, Amanda, Jazaieri, Hooria, Brozovich, Faith, Heimberg, Richard, Gross, James J.·2016·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to investigate treatment outcome and mediators of cognitive-behavioral group therapy (CBGT) versus mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) versus waitlist (WL) in patients with generalized social anxiety disorder (SAD). METHOD: One hundred eight unmedicated patients (55.6% female; mean age = 32.7 years, SD = 8.0; 43.5% Caucasian, 39% Asian, 9.3% Hispanic, 8.3% other) were randomized to CBGT versus MBSR versus WL and completed assessments at baseline, posttreatment/WL, and at 1-year follow-up, including the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale-Self-Report (primary outcome; Liebowitz, 1987) as well as measures of treatment-related processes. RESULTS: Linear mixed model analysis showed that CBGT and MBSR both produced greater improvements on most measures compared with WL. Both treatments yielded similar improvements in social anxiety symptoms, cognitive reappraisal frequency and self-efficacy, cognitive distortions, mindfulness skills, attention focusing, and rumination. There were greater decreases in subtle avoidance behaviors following CBGT than MBSR. Mediation analyses revealed that increases in reappraisal frequency, mindfulness skills, attention focusing, and attention shifting, and decreases in subtle avoidance behaviors and cognitive distortions, mediated the impact of both CBGT and MBSR on social anxiety symptoms. However, increases in reappraisal self-efficacy and decreases in avoidance behaviors mediated the impact of CBGT (vs. MBSR) on social anxiety symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: CBGT and MBSR both appear to be efficacious for SAD. However, their effects may be a result of both shared and unique changes in underlying psychological processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ccp0000092

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

5 of 36 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    For CBGT compared with MBSR, increases in reappraisal self-efficacy and decreases in avoidance behaviors mediated the effect on social anxiety symptoms.

    “However, increases in reappraisal self-efficacy and decreases in avoidance behaviors mediated the impact of CBGT (vs. MBSR) on social anxiety symptoms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The CBGT and MBSR treatments were delivered with adequate fidelity to their respective protocols.
  • Findingown data

    In linear mixed models, both CBGT and MBSR led to larger improvements than waitlist on most outcome measures.

    “Linear mixed model analysis showed that CBGT and MBSR both produced greater improvements on most measures compared to WL.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The CBGT and MBSR treatments were delivered with adequate fidelity to their respective protocols.
  • Findingown data

    Subtle avoidance behaviors decreased more after CBGT than after MBSR.

    “There were greater decreases in subtle avoidance behaviors following CBGT than MBSR.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The CBGT and MBSR treatments were delivered with adequate fidelity to their respective protocols.
  • Findingown data

    Mediation analyses indicated that increases in reappraisal frequency, mindfulness skills, attention focusing, and attention shifting, along with decreases in subtle avoidance behaviors and cognitive distortions, mediated the effects of both CBGT and MBSR on social anxiety symptoms.

    “Mediation analyses revealed that increases in reappraisal frequency, mindfulness skills, attention focusing and attention shifting, and decreases in subtle avoidance behaviors and cognitive distortions mediated the impact of both CBGT and MBSR on social anxiety symptoms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The CBGT and MBSR treatments were delivered with adequate fidelity to their respective protocols.
  • Findingown data

    CBGT and MBSR did not differ significantly in change in attention focusing.

    “For attention focusing, LMM demonstrated greater increases (all ts > 2.21, ps < .05) for CBGT (+1.0; 4.5%; d = 0.50) and for MBSR (+1.1; 5%; d = 0.62) compared to WL (-0.8; 3.5%), with no significant CBGT vs. MBSR differences (t = 0.02, df = 63, p = .99).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 31
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 30
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 5
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mindfulness-based interventions consistently reduce anxiety symptoms in various psychiatric and medical groups, with larger effects in those with anxiety and mood disorders.

    “a recent meta-analysis (Hofmann, Sawyer, Witt, & Oh, 2010) showed that mindfulness-based interventions reliably reduced anxiety symptoms across a variety of psychiatric and medical populations (Hedges's g = 0.63), and even more so in the subgroup of patients with anxiety and mood disorders (g = 0.97).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hofmann, Sawyer, Witt, & Oh, 2010 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The FFMQ generally has good internal consistency.

    “The instrument has good internal consistency in general (Baer et al., 2006)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Baer et al., 2006 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The brooding subscale has shown good reliability in other studies (α = .77).

    “The brooding subscale has been shown to have good reliability in other studies (α = .77; Treynor et al., 2003)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Treynor et al., 2003 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The LSAS-SR has good reliability and construct validity.

    “The LSAS-SR has good reliability and construct validity (Rytwinski et al., 2009)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rytwinski et al., 2009 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Mindfulness changes have been found to mediate MBSR and MBCT across clinical samples and in patients with generalized anxiety disorder.

    “Changes in mindfulness have been found to be a mediator of MBSR and MBCT across clinical samples (Gu et al., 2015), and specifically in patients with generalized anxiety disorder (Hoge et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gu et al., 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Hoge et al., 2015 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    CBGT and MBSR did not differ in their improvements on social anxiety symptoms, cognitive reappraisal frequency and self-efficacy, cognitive distortions, mindfulness skills, attention focusing, or rumination.

    “Both treatments yielded similar improvements in social anxiety symptoms, cognitive reappraisal frequency and self-efficacy, cognitive distortions, mindfulness skills, attention focusing and rumination.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The CBGT and MBSR treatments were delivered with adequate fidelity to their respective protocols.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Non-white patients made up 56.5% of the sample: 39% Asian American, 9% Latino American, 6.5% multiple ethnicities, 1% African American, and 1% Native American.

    “It is important to note that the 56.5% of the patient sample were non-white (39% Asian American, 9% Latino American, 6.5% multiple ethnicities, 1% African American, 1% Native American).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Cognitive reappraisal self-efficacy increased significantly more with MBSR than with WL.

    “For cognitive reappraisal self-efficacy, LMM demonstrated significantly greater increases (all ts > 2.24, ps < .05) for CBGT (+1.4; 40%; d = 1.05) and for MBSR (+0.8; 22%; d = 0.58) compared to WL (+0.2; 5%), with no significant CBGT vs. MBSR differences (t = 1.77, df = 56, p = .08).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Attention focusing increased more with MBSR than with WL.

    “For attention focusing, LMM demonstrated greater increases (all ts > 2.21, ps < .05) for CBGT (+1.0; 4.5%; d = 0.50) and for MBSR (+1.1; 5%; d = 0.62) compared to WL (-0.8; 3.5%), with no significant CBGT vs. MBSR differences (t = 0.02, df = 63, p = .99).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Cognitive distortions decreased significantly more with MBSR than with WL.

    “For cognitive distortions, LMM demonstrated significantly greater decreases (all ts > 2.40, ps < .05) for CBGT (-9.1; 32%; d = 0.59) and for MBSR (-8.3; 27.5%; d = 0.67) compared to WL (-1; 3%), with no significant CBGT vs. MBSR differences (t = 0.20, df = 59, p = .84).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Subtle avoidance behaviors decreased significantly more with MBSR than with WL.

    “For subtle avoidance behaviors, LMM demonstrated significantly greater decreases (all ts > 2.59, ps < .05) for CBGT (-20.1; 24%; d = 1.27) and for MBSR (-9.8; 12%; d = 0.64) compared to WL (-1; 1%), and significantly greater decreases for CBGT vs. MBSR (t = 2.30, df = 66, p = .025).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingown data

    Rumination decreased significantly more with MBSR than with WL.

    “For rumination, LMM revealed significantly greater decreases (all ts > 2.01, ps < .05) for CBGT (-2.9; 22%; d = 0.94) and for MBSR (-1.5; 11%; d = 0.46) compared to WL (+0.3; 2%), with no significant CBGT vs. MBSR differences (t = 1.27, df = 67, p = .21).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Mindfulness skills increased significantly more with MBSR than with WL.

    “For mindfulness skills, LMM demonstrated significantly greater increases (all ts > 5.79, ps < .001) for CBGT (+14.4; 13%; d = 1.67) and for MBSR (+17.6; 17%; d = 1.44) compared to WL (-5.6, 5%), with no significant CBGT vs. MBSR differences (t = 0.78, df = 61, p = .44).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingown data

    Cognitive reappraisal frequency increased significantly more with MBSR than with WL.

    “For cognitive reappraisal frequency, LMM demonstrated significantly greater increases (all ts > 2.60, ps < .05) for CBGT (+1.1; 30%, d = 0.59) and for MBSR (+1.2; 33%, d = 0.71) compared to WL (+0.4; 10%), with no significant CBGT vs. MBSR differences (t = 0.04, df = 59, p = .97).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Another randomized trial found individual CBT and ACT both more effective than waitlist, with no difference between treatments on multiple measures of social anxiety.

    “A different RCT compared individual CBT (n = 40) to individual ACT (n = 34) and to a waitlist control group (n = 26) and found a similar pattern of greater efficacy for both treatments than waitlist and no differential treatment effect on multiple indices of social anxiety (Craske et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Craske et al., 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    That trial had potential confounds, including allowing concurrent psychotropic medications and alternative psychotherapies.

    “However, potential confounds include permitting participants with concurrent use of psychotropic medications and alternative (i.e., non-cognitive or behavioral) psychotherapies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    That study's conclusions are limited by methodological problems such as lacking a control group, not measuring treatment adherence or follow-up outcomes, including patients taking psychotropic medications, and unequal treatment lengths.

    “However, inferences from this study are somewhat constrained due to methodological issues, including no control group, inclusion of measurement of treatment adherence, or measurement of follow-up outcomes, and inclusion of patients with concurrent use of psychotropic medications, and unequal duration of treatment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Both CBGT and MBSR seem effective for social anxiety disorder.

    “CBGT and MBSR both appear to be efficacious for SAD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The sample of patients with generalized SAD is representative of the broader SAD population.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A meta-analysis of meditation studies found strong evidence for cognitive and emotional reactivity, moderate evidence for mindfulness, rumination, and worry, and preliminary but insufficient evidence for self-compassion and psychological flexibility as mediators.

    “This analysis found strong evidence for cognitive and emotional reactivity (stress reactivation of negative thinking and emotional patterns), moderate evidence for mindfulness, rumination, and worry, and preliminary but insufficient evidence for self-compassion and psychological flexibility as mediators of outcome.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gu, Strauss, Bond, & Cavanagh, 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The ADIS has shown excellent inter-rater reliability.

    “The ADIS has demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability (Brown, Di Nardo, Lehman, & Campbell, 2001)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brown, Di Nardo, Lehman, & Campbell, 2001

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A previous study found CBGT and MBSR similar in improving mood, functioning, and quality of life, but CBGT led to greater improvement in social anxiety symptoms and higher response and remission rates.

    “CBGT and MBSR were comparable in improving mood, functioning, and quality of life, but CBGT produced significantly greater improvement in social anxiety symptoms, as well as greater response and remission rates (Koszycki et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Koszycki et al., 2007 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The CD-Quest has good internal consistency (αs = .83-.86) and convergent validity with self-report measures of depression, anxiety, and automatic thoughts (rs = .51-.65).

    “The CD-Quest has shown good internal consistency (αs = .83 - .86) and convergent validity with self-report measures of depression, anxiety, and automatic thoughts (rs = .51 - .65; De Oliveira, 2015; Morrison et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites De Oliveira, 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Morrison et al., 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Most reviewed studies of mediators for MBSR and MBCT had important methodological weaknesses, underscoring the need for more rigorous research.

    “However, the authors state that most of the reviewed studies had key methodological shortcomings and highlight the need for more rigorous investigation of mediators of MBSR and MBCT”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gu, Strauss, Bond, & Cavanagh, 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Rumination, particularly the brooding subtype, predicts changes in social anxiety during CBT for social anxiety disorder.

    “Other research has implicated rumination, specifically the brooding subtype, as an important predictor of changes in social anxiety during CBT for SAD (Brozovich et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brozovich et al., 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The ACS focusing subscale has good internal consistency (α = .82), and the shifting subscale has acceptable internal consistency (α = .68).

    “Internal consistency is good for the focusing subscale (α = .82) and acceptable for the shifting subscale (α = .68; Olafsson et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Olafsson et al., 2011 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A review found that mindfulness and acceptance-based treatments significantly reduce social anxiety symptoms, yet methodological weaknesses restrict inferences and comparisons with CBT.

    “A recent review (Norton, Abbott, Norberg, & Hunt, 2015) concluded that mindfulness and acceptance-based treatments significantly reduce social anxiety symptoms, but that methodological weaknesses strongly limit inferences and comparisons to gold-standard psychosocial interventions for SAD such as CBT.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Norton, Abbott, Norberg, & Hunt, 2015 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A recent randomized trial found CBGT and MAGT both more effective than waitlist, but not different from each other in reducing social anxiety symptoms or most secondary outcomes.

    “Both interventions were more efficacious than waitlist, but not different from each other in reducing social anxiety symptoms or scores on most of the secondary outcome variables.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kocovski, Fleming, Hawley, Huta, & Antony, 2013 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Among adults with social anxiety disorder, MBSR has been shown to improve mood, functioning, social anxiety, quality of life, self-esteem, negative self-views, trait anxiety, negative emotional reactivity, and depression.

    “In adults with SAD, MBSR has demonstrated improvement in mood, functioning, social anxiety, and quality of life (Koszycki, Benger, Shlik, & Bradwejn, 2007), self-esteem, negative self-views, trait anxiety, negative emotional reactivity, and depression (Goldin, Ziv, Jazaieri, & Gross, 2012; Goldin, Ziv, Jazaieri, Hahn, & Gross, 2013; Goldin & Gross, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Koszycki et al., 2007 source
    • cites Goldin et al., 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Goldin et al., 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The SAFE has good discriminant and construct validity in patients with social anxiety disorder.

    “It has good discriminant and construct validity in patients with SAD”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cuming et al., 2009 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    MBSR may be just as effective as CBGT in reducing social anxiety symptoms and sustaining those gains.

    “This pattern of results suggests that MBSR may be as efficacious as CBGT at reducing social anxiety symptoms and maintaining treatment gains.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Both CBT and MBSR may enhance the executive ability to direct attention, though through different training methods.

    “This suggests that both CBT and MBSR may increases executive ability to direct attention albeit via different types of training methods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    An intention-to-treat approach, using original treatment assignments, was used for all analyses.

    “All results were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach based on treatment assignments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    In this study, internal consistency was good for both ACS subscales (focusing α = .85; shifting α = .74).

    “In this study, internal consistency was good for both subscales (focusing α = .85; shifting α = .74).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Treatment dropout was low and similar across CBGT, MBSR, and waitlist.

    “Dropout from treatment was low and did not differ (χ2(2, N = 108) = 1.05, p = .59) across CBGT (n = 2; 6%), MBSR (n = 3; 8%) and WL (n = 1; 3%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    In this study, the LSAS-SR showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .92).

    “its internal consistency was excellent in this study (Cronbach's α = .92).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Ratings showed that both the CBGT therapists and the MBSR instructor stayed within protocol (above 4 of 5 each session), with no difference between groups.

    “Adherence ratings indicated that the CBGT therapists and MBSR instructor were “in protocol” (rating > 4 of 5 for each session) with no between-group differences, t(11) = 0.83, p = .43, in adherence for CBGT, Mean ± SD: 4.92 ± 0.27, versus MBSR, 4.81 ± 0.17.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    At baseline, internal consistency was good for CR-F (α = .89) and CR-SE (α = .93).

    “Internal consistency for CR-F (α = .89) and CR-SE (α = .93) were good at baseline.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Participants were randomly assigned to CBGT, MBSR, or waitlist.

    “the remaining 108 patients were randomly assigned to CBGT (n = 36), MBSR (n = 36), or WL (n = 36).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A shift in metacognition-specifically, belief in one's ability to use reappraisal-is a core lesson in CBT and probably helps reduce social anxiety symptoms.

    “The shift in metacognition, namely, awareness of and belief in one's ability to use reappraisal effectively when needed (i.e., reappraisal self-efficacy) is a fundamental learning lesson in CBT and likely contributes to social anxiety symptom reduction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    At baseline, the three groups were comparable on demographic and clinical variables, with no significant differences.

    “The three groups did not differ significantly (all ps > .05) in gender, age, education, ethnicity, marital status, income, current or past Axis I comorbidity, past psychotherapy or pharmacotherapy, age at SAD symptom onset, and years since symptom onset (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    With completion defined as attending at least 9 of 12 sessions, 33 patients (92%) finished CBGT and 33 (92%) finished MBSR.

    “Based on a criterion of 9 of 12 sessions attended for treatment completer status, 33 (92%) patients completed CBGT and 33 (92%) completed MBSR.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    In this study, the FFMQ had excellent internal consistency at baseline (α = .91).

    “it was excellent in this study at baseline (α = .91).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Both CBT and MBSR are effective treatments for adults with SAD.

    “The clinical implications of this study are that both CBT and MBSR are efficacious treatments for adults with SAD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These results point to many shared psychological processes altered by CBT and MBSR, which may explain why both are equally effective for SAD.

    “These results highlight the many shared underlying psychological processes that are modulated during CBT and MBSR and may help explain why both are equivalently effective for SAD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    In the current study, the brooding subscale had good internal consistency (α = .76).

    “as well as in the current study (α = .76).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    In this study, the SAFE had good internal consistency at baseline (α = .91).

    “internal consistency was good in this study at baseline (α = .91).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    In this study, the CD-Quest had excellent internal consistency at baseline (α = .91).

    “Internal consistency was excellent in this study at baseline (α = .91).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Preliminary evidence from mindfulness meditation studies suggests improvements in cognitive distortions, increases in mindfulness and emotion regulation, and decreases in avoidance of emotional experience.

    “Across studies of mindfulness meditation, there is preliminary evidence for improvement in cognitive distortions (Sears & Kraus, 2009), and increases in mindfulness and emotion regulation, as well as decreases in avoidance of emotional experience (Chiesa, Anselmi, & Serretti, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Sears & Kraus, 2009 source
    • cites Chiesa, Anselmi, & Serretti, 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The two treatments produce both shared and unique changes in psychological processes that mediate or predict outcome.

    “They have both shared and unique changes in underlying psychological processes that mediate or predict treatment outcome.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Adherence was rated in real time by a trained rater who attended every CBGT and MBSR session, using scales developed for each treatment.

    “To assure treatment adherence, a trained rater was present in every CBGT and MBSR session to conduct real-time rating of adherence using adherence scales developed for CBGT and for MBSR.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Avoidance and cognitive distortions have been identified as mediators of CBT for SAD, consistent with cognitive behavioral models of SAD.

    “Avoidance and cognitive distortions have been found to be mediators of CBT for SAD (Hedman et al., 2013; Smits et al., 2006) and accords with cognitive behavioral models of SAD.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hedman et al., 2013 source
    • cites Smits et al., 2006 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    One study provides evidence that cognitive distortions mediate mindfulness-based interventions.

    “While there is one study showing evidence for cognitive distortions as a mediator of mindfulness-based interventions (Gu et al., 2015), it is not yet clear whether CBT and MBSR arrive at reduction in cognitive distortions via different underlying mechanisms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gu et al., 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The average number of sessions attended was similar for CBGT and MBSR, with no significant difference.

    “Mean number of sessions attended for CBGT (Mean ± SD = 10.47 ± 1.56) and MBSR (10.37 ± 2.09) were not significantly different, t(71) = 0.22, p = .82.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
53 of 53
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The CBGT and MBSR treatments were delivered with adequate fidelity to their respective protocols.

    “Cognitive behavioral group therapy (CBGT) was delivered by two Ph.D. clinical psychologists trained by Dr. Richard Heimberg to implement his CBGT for SAD protocol (Heimberg & Becker, 2002).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The sample of patients with generalized SAD is representative of the broader SAD population.

    “108 unmedicated patients (55.6% female; mean age = 32.7, SD = 8.0; 43.5% Caucasian, 39% Asian, 9.3% Hispanic, 8.3% other) were randomized to CBGT vs. MBSR vs. WL”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    CBT openly addresses avoidance and trains patients to confront feared situations through exposures.

    “CBT explicitly discusses the role of avoidance, as well as trains patients to counter avoidance by engaging in and vicariously learning from multiple exposures to feared situations.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    MBSR does not directly target safety behaviors or avoidance behaviors.

    “Unlike CBT, MBSR does not explicitly address safety behaviors and specifically avoidance behaviors.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Community MBSR groups tend to be larger and include people with a wider range of presenting problems.

    “Furthermore, community-based MBSR groups are typically larger and include individuals with a more diverse set of presenting problems.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The demographic diversity of the sample is enough to make the results highly generalizable to adults with SAD.

    “Thus, these results are highly generalizable.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Comparisons of CBGT and MBSR have demonstrated decreased frequency of subtle avoidance behaviors during CBGT but not during MBSR.

    “Comparisons of CBGT and MBSR have demonstrated decreased frequency of subtle avoidance behaviors during CBGT but not during MBSR 13 as one point of difference in mechanism.”

    From Evaluation of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Mindfulness Meditation in Brain Changes During Reappraisal and Acceptance Among Patients With Social Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Results section (page not supplied) reports significant decreases in subtle avoidance behaviors for both CBGT and MBSR compared with the waitlist, though the decrease was greater for CBGT. This contradicts the claim that avoidance decreased during CBGT but not during MBSR. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • When negative affect does not kick off suppression and avoidance, the capacity to notice and describe negative emotional experiences can predict positive clinical trajectories even in the presence of stressful emotions as defined by their mere form.

    “When it does not, the capacity to notice and describe negative emotional experiences can predict positive clinical trajectories even in the presence of stressful emotions as defined by their mere form 92 .”

    From “Third-wave” cognitive and behavioral therapies and the emergence of a process-based approach to intervention in psychiatry (2021) · cites this paper as [92]

    The Results (Mediators of CBGT and MBSR Effects; page not provided) report that increased mindfulness skills and decreased safety behaviors each mediated reductions in social anxiety symptoms. The Methods (Measures; page not provided) include observing and describing among the mindfulness skills measured, but the paper does not establish that those particular skills predict improvement when negative affect does not trigger suppression or avoidance, or despite stressful emotions. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • As previously reported using self-rated negative emotion data, CBGT and MBSR both increased reappraisal and mindfulness skills, including acceptance.

    “Alternatively, as previously reported using self-rated negative emotion data, 13,16 CBGT and MBSR both increased reappraisal and mindfulness skills, including acceptance, and the brain results in this study may reflect greater recruitment of a core domain-general cognitive control network that supports implementation of both emotion-regulation strategies.”

    From Evaluation of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Mindfulness Meditation in Brain Changes During Reappraisal and Acceptance Among Patients With Social Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Results (CBGT and MBSR Related Psychological Processes; page unavailable) report increased reappraisal frequency and mindfulness skills with both treatments. The Methods (Measures; page unavailable) describe self-report questionnaires, including mindfulness facets related to acceptance, but the copy does not establish a separate increase in acceptance or that these findings came from self-rated negative-emotion data. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Rigorous RCTs comparing mindfulness-based interventions and CBT have failed to show differential treatment effects on a whole range of mechanisms, including dispositional mindfulness, reappraisal, self-efficacy, acceptance, catastrophizing, and positive and negative affect.

    “Rigorous RCTs comparing mindfulness-based interventions and CBT have failed to show differential treatment effects on a whole range of mechanisms, including dispositional mindfulness, reappraisal, self-efficacy, acceptance, catastrophizing, and positive and negative affect [11,73,74].”

    From Testing the mindfulness-to-meaning theory: Evidence for mindful positive emotion regulation from a reanalysis of longitudinal data (2017) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Results (CBGT and MBSR Related Psychological Processes; page not provided) report no significant between-treatment differences in mindfulness skills, reappraisal frequency, or reappraisal self-efficacy. This paper does not establish that finding for acceptance, catastrophizing, or positive and negative affect. Its Results (Mediators of CBGT and MBSR Effects) also report differential mediation by reappraisal self-efficacy, a distinction the broad claim obscures. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A randomized controlled trial of CBGT versus MBSR in patients with SAD found similar improvements in social anxiety symptoms.

    “A recent randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavioral group therapy (CBGT) versus MBSR in patients with SAD found similar improvements in social anxiety symptoms (Goldin et al., 2016).”

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentχ²(2) = 1.05reported p = .59 · recomputed p = .592

    “χ2(2, N = 108) = 1.05, p = .59”

  • Consistentt(11) = 0.83reported p = .43 · recomputed p = .424

    “t(11) = 0.83, p = .43”

  • Consistentt(71) = 0.22reported p = .82 · recomputed p = .827

    “t(71) = 0.22, p = .82”

  • Consistentχ²(1) = 9.97reported p = .002 · recomputed p = .002

    “χ2(1, N = 72) = 9.97, p = .002”

  • Consistentχ²(1) = 7.41reported p = .006 · recomputed p = .006

    “χ2(1, N = 72) = 7.41, p = .006”

  • Consistentχ²(1) = 0.23reported p = .63 · recomputed p = .632

    “χ2(1, N = 72) = 0.23, p = .63”

6 of 6

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Session-attendance test has too many degrees of freedom

    Minor

    The comparison includes at most 36 CBGT and 36 MBSR patients. An independent-groups t-test of their attendance could have at most 70 degrees of freedom, not 71.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldin, P. R., Morrison, A., Jazaieri, H., Brozovich, F., Heimberg, R., & Gross, J. J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Goldin, Philippe R.
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2016-05
Volume
84
Issue
5
Pages
427-437
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2315453641
Cited by
202
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
38.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • MindRxiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH076074)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, group cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction, treatment outcomes, mediation analysis, cognitive reappraisal, self-efficacy, cognitive distortions, mindfulness skills, attentional focus, rumination, avoidance behavior, unmedicated patients
MeSH terms
Phobia, Social, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Group, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Self Efficacy, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review