CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 63Education during COVID-19 pandemicOnline and Blended LearningE-Learning and COVID-19

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and validation of a students’ remote learning attitude scale (RLAS) in higher education

Open access
Tzafilkou, Katerina, Perifanou, Maria, Economides, Anastasios A.·2021·Education and Information Technologies
DOI 10.1007/s10639-021-10586-0PMC PMC8153097
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Considering the distinct particularities of emergency remote education (ERE) and the urgent need for new or adjusted measurement models, this study develops and validates a multidimensional instrument to measure students' attitude towards ERE. The Remote Learning Attitude Scale (RLAS) was explored and validated on a sample of 142 students participating in fully remote teaching and learning university programmes during the covid-19 crisis, in Greece. The exploratory factor analysis clearly revealed five dimensions, and the model was evaluated through PLS-SEM confirmatory factor analysis. The study also found that the students' field of study and prior experience in distance learning cause differentiations in RLAS dimensions, while gender and age make no statistical differences. Results indicate that RLAS is a practical and effective tool for evaluating the university students' attitude towards remote as opposed to traditional teaching and learning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10639-021-10586-0

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 79

  1. Abdous, M. (2019). Influence of satisfaction and preparedness on online students’ feelings of anxiety. Internet and Higher Education, 41, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.01.001 · DOI
  2. Adanır, G. A., Borkoev, B., Saliyeva, K., et al. (2020). Kyrgyz learners’ and teachers’ experiences and perceptions related to ICT use in high school courses. Education and Information Technology, 25, 4765–4780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10196-2 · DOI
  3. Al-Malki, A. N., Almasre, M., Al-Malki, A., Al-Harbi, R., Burns, M., Long, B. C., … Seaman, J. (2013). Online College Students 2015: Comprehensive data on demands and preferences. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 24(1), 128–152https://doi.org/10.7595/management.fon.2013.0026 · DOI
  4. Aljukhadar, M., Senecal, S., & Nantel, J. (2014). Is more always better? Investigating the task-technology ft theory in an online user context. Information & Management, 51(4), 391–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.10.003 · DOI
  5. Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., Poulin, R., & Straut, T. T. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the UnitedStates. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC. (Vol. 23, p. 2016).
  6. Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., et al. (2020). Blended learning adoption and implementation in higher education: A theoretical and systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1–48.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09477-z. · DOI
  7. Anwar, A., Seger, C., Tollefson, A., Diachun, C. A. B., Tanaka, P., & Umar, S. (2020). Medical education in the COVID-19 era: Impact on anesthesiology trainees. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 66, 109949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109949 · DOI
  8. Asyraf, W. M., & Afthanorhan, B. W. (2013). A comparison of partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and covariance based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) for confirmatory factor analysis. International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology (IJESIT).
  9. Atkinson, J., & Blankenship, R. (2009). Online learning readiness of undergraduate college students: A comparison between male and female students. The Journal of Learning in Higher Education., 5, 49–56.
  10. Ayub, H. (2017). Parental Influence and Attitude of Students towards Technical Education and Vocational Training. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(7), 534–538. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.7.925. · DOI
  11. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on multiplying factors for various chi-squared approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 16(2), 296–298. · DOI
  13. Bates, A. W. (2019). Trends in open education. In Teaching in a digital age, 2nd ed. (pp. 559–605). Tony Bates Associates Ltd.
  14. Bergdahl, N., & Nouri, J. (2020). Covid-19 and crisis-prompted Distance Education in Sweden. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1–17.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09470-6. · DOI
  15. Bernard, R. M., Brauer, A., Abrami, P. C., & Surkes, M. (2004). The development of a questionnaire for predicting online learning achievement. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 25(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791042000212440 · DOI
  16. Besser, A., Lotem, S., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2020). Psychological stress and vocal symptoms among uUniversity pProfessors in Israel: Implications of the shift to online synchronous teaching during the COVID-19 pPandemic. Journal of Voice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.05.028 · DOI
  17. Bhagat, K. K., Wu, L. Y., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). Development and validation of the perception of students towards online learning (POSTOL). Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 350–359.
  18. Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–6.
  19. Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., ... Rodes, V. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 Pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–126.
  20. Chang, C. T., Hajiyev, J., & Su, C. R. (2017). Examining the students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? The general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning approach. Computers & Education, 111, 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.010 · DOI
  21. Chen, Y.-C., Lin, Y.-C., Yeh, R. C., & Lou, S.-J. (2013). Examining factor affecting college students’ intention to use web-based instruction systems: Toward an integrated model. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 111–121.
  22. Chen, B., Fan, Y.-Z., Zhang, G.-G., & Wang, Q. (2017). Examining motivation and self-regulated learning strategies of returning MOOCs learning. The Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada. · DOI
  23. Chen, J. C., Dobinson, T., & Kent, S. (2020). Lecturers’ perceptions and experiences of Blackboard Collaborate as a distance learning and teaching tool via Open Universities Australia (OUA), Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35:3, 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1688654. · DOI
  24. Chou, C. H., Wang, Y. S., & Tang, T. I. (2015). Exploring the determinants of knowledge adoption in virtual communities: A social influence perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 35(3), 364–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.02.001 · DOI
  25. Chung, E., Subramaniam, G., & Christ Dass, L. (2020). Online learning readiness among university students in Malaysia amidst Covid-19. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i2.10294 · DOI
  26. Coates, H. (2006). Student engagement in campus-based and online education: University connections. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203969465 · DOI
  27. Cole, A. W., & Timmerman, C.E. (2015). What do current college students think about MOOCs ? Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 188–202.
  28. Dağhan, G., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2016). Modeling the continuance usage intention of online learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.066 · DOI
  29. Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 39(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.02. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4. · DOI · Paper page
  32. Grapentine, T. H. (2001). A practitioner’s comment on Aimee L. Drolet and Donald G. Morrison’s “Do we really need multiple-iItem measures in service rResearch?”. Journal of Service Research, 4(2), 155–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050142007 · DOI
  33. Guillén-gámez, F. D., Colomo-magaña, E., Sánchez-rivas, E., & Pérez, R. (2020). Attitude towards ICT : a statistical analysis of gender differences in Spanish higher education teachers, In 3rd International conference on Advanced Research in Education, Teaching & Learning, Oxford UK, 1–11. · DOI
  34. Guo, Z., Xiao, L., Van Toorn, C., Lai, Y., & Seo, C. (2016). Promoting online learners’ continuance intention: An integrated flow framework. Information & Management., 53, 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.10.010 · DOI
  35. Hachey, A. C., Wladis, C., & Conway, K. (2015). Prior online course experience and G.P.Aa. as predictors of subsequent online STEM course outcomes. The Internet and Higher Education, 25(Supplement C), 11–17. · DOI
  36. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate d data analysis: A global perspective. In P. P. Hall (Ed.), Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th Ed., Vol. 7th). Pearson.
  37. Hasan, N., & Bao, Y. (2020). Impact of “e-Learning crack-up” perception on psychological distress among college students during COVID-19 pandemic: A mediating role of “fear of academic year loss.” Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105355 · DOI
  38. Hoque, M. M. A. S., & Awang, Z. (2016). Exploratory factor analysis of entrepreneurial marketing: scale development and validation in the SME context of Bangladesh. Proceedings of the International Social Sciences and Tourism Research Conference, pp, 22–38.
  39. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. · DOI · Paper page
  40. Huang, L.-Q., Zhang, J., & Liu, Y. (2017). Antecedents of student MOOC revisit intention: Moderation effect of course difficulty. International Journal of Information Management, 37, 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.12.002 · DOI
  41. Huang, R., Tlili, A., Chang, TW. et al. (2020). Disrupted classes, undisrupted learning during COVID-19 outbreak in China: application of open educational practices and resources. Smart Learning Environments, 7, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00125-8. · DOI · Paper page
  42. Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perception. Computers & Education, 55, 1080–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.05.004 · DOI
  43. Ifinedo, P. (2018). Determinants of students’ continuance intention to use blogs to learn: An empirical investigation. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(4), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1436594 · DOI
  44. Ifinedo, E., Rikala, J., & Hämäläinen, T. (2020). Factors affecting Nigerian teacher educators’ technology integration: Considering characteristics, knowledge constructs, ICT practices and beliefs. Computers and Education, 146. · DOI
  45. Jogezai, N. A., Baloch, F. A., Jaffar, M., Shah, T., Khilji, G. K., & Bashir, S. (2021). Teachers’ attitudes towards social media (SM) use in online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The effects of SM use by teachers and religious scholars during physical distancing. Heliyon, 7(4), e06781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06781 · DOI
  46. Joo, Y. J., So, H. J., & Kim, N. H. (2018). Examination of relationships among students’ self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCS. Computers & Education, 122, 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187–200. · DOI
  48. Kim, S., Park, C., & O"Rourke, J. (2017). Effectiveness of online simulation training: Measuring faculty knowledge, perceptions, and intention to adopt. Nurse Education Today, 51, 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.022. · DOI
  49. Lee, C., Yeung, A. S., & Ip, T. (2016). Use of computer technology for English language Learning: Do learning styles, gender, and age matter? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 1035–1051. · DOI
  50. Lee, K., Choi, H., & Cho, Y. H. (2019). Becoming a competent self: A developmental process of adult distance learning. Internet and Higher Education, 41, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.12.001. · DOI
  51. Manalo, T. A., Higgins, M. I., Pettitt-Schieber, B., Pettitt, B. J., Mehta, A., & Hartsell, L. M. (2020). How I Do It: A strategy for undergraduate medical education in urology during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Surgical Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.09.011 · DOI
  52. McGarry, B. J., Theobald, K., Lewis, P. A., & Coyer, F. (2015). Flexible learning design in curriculum delivery promotes student engagement and develops metacognitive learners: An integrated review. Nurse Education Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.06.009 Churchill Livingstone. · DOI
  53. Mishra, D. L., Gupta, D. T., & Shree, D. A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of tam and is success model. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.044 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Moore, M. (1997).Theory of transactional distance. Keegan, D., ed. Theoretical Principles of Distance Education, Routledge, pp. 22–38.
  56. Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Mouakket, S. (2015). Factors influencing continuance intention to use social network sites: The Facebook case. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.045. · DOI
  58. Ni, A. Y. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of classroom and online learning: Teaching research methods. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2013.12001730 · DOI
  59. Nistor, N., Gogus, A., & Lerche, T. (2013). Educational technology acceptance across national and professional cultures: A European study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 33–749. · DOI
  60. OECD. (2020a). Education responses to covid-19: Embracing digital learning and online collaboration. Retrieved September 2020, from https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=120_120544-8ksud7oaj2&title=Education_responses_to_Covid-19_Embracing_digital_learning_and_online_collaboration.
  61. OECD. (2020b). OECD Policy rResponses to Coronavirus (COVID-19) lLearning remotely when schools close: How well are students and schools prepared? Insights from PISA. Retrieved September 2020, from https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=127_127063-iiwm328658&title=Learning-remotely-when-schools-close.
  62. Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health., 37, 597–598. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.2027c.x · DOI
  63. Paul, N., & Glassman, M. (2017). Relationship between internet self-efficacy and internet anxiety: A nuanced approach to understanding the connection. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 147. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2791 · DOI
  64. Pollack, B. L., & Alexandrov, A. (2013). Nomological validity of the net promoter index question. Journal of Services Marketing, 27(2), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041311309243 · DOI
  65. Rath, L., Olmstead, K., Zhang, J., & Beach, P. (2019). Hearing students’ voices: Understanding student perspectives of online learning. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 22(4), n4.
  66. Rigdon, E. E. (2012). Rethinking partial least squares path modeling: In praise of simple methods. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 341–358. · DOI
  67. Romero Martínez, S. J., Ordóñez Camacho, X. G., Guillén-Gamez, F. D., & Agapito, J. B. (2020). Attitudes toward technology among distance education students: Validation of an explanatory model. Online Learning Journal, 24(2), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2028 · DOI
  68. Samueli, B., Sror, N., Jotkowitz, A., & Taragin, B. (2020). Remote pathology education during the COVID-19 era: Crisis converted to opportunity. Annals of Diagnostic Pathology, 49, 151612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2020.151612 · DOI
  69. Sarstedt, M., & Wilczynski, P. (2009). More for less? A comparison of single-item and multi-item measures. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 69(2), 211. Retrieved September 2020, from http://scholar.google.de/scholar?q=marko+sarstedt&btnG=&hl=de&as_sdt=0%2C11#1.
  70. Smith, G. G., Sorensen, C., Gump, A., Heindel, A. J., Caris, M., & Romero Martínez, C. D. (2011). Overcoming student resistance to group work: Online versus face-to-face. Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.005 · DOI
  71. Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. Innosight Institute, (May), 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-007-9037-5. · DOI
  72. Tanis, C. J. (2020). The seven principles of online learning: Feedback from faculty and alumni on its importance for teaching and learning. Research in Learning Technology, 28, 2319. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2319 · DOI
  73. Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X.-H. (2015). A cross-cultural examination of the impact of social, organisational and individual factors on educational technology acceptance between British and Lebanese university students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12169 · DOI
  74. Tsai, Y.-H., Lin, C.-H., Hong, J.-C., & Tai, K.-H. (2018). The effects of metacognition on online learning interest and continuance to learn with MOOCs. Computers & Education, 121, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.011 · DOI
  75. Tzifopoulos, M. (2020). In the shadow of Coronavirus: Distance education and digital literacy skills in Greece. International Journal of Social Science and Technology, 5(2), 1–14. Retrieved 21 May 2021 from http://ebooks.edu.gr/new/ps.php.
  76. Tzivinikou, S., Charitaki, G., & Kagkara, D. (2020). Distance Education Attitudes (DEAS) during Covid-19 crisis: Factor structure, reliability and construct Validity of the brief DEA scale in Greek-speaking SEND teachers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning,. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09483-1 · DOI
  77. Zayabalaradjane, Z. (2020). COVID-19: Strategies for online engagement of remote learners. Online Submission, 9(246), 1–11.
  78. Zhou, M. M. (2016). Chinese university students’ acceptance of MOOCs: A self-determination perspective. Computers & Education, 92–93, 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.012 · DOI
  79. Zhu, Y., Zhang, J. H., Au, W., et al. (2020). University students’ online learning attitudes and continuous intention to undertake online courses: A self-regulated learning perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1485–1519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09753-w · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tzafilkou, K., Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. A.
Affiliations
University of Macedonia (GR)
Corresponding author
Tzafilkou, Katerina
ORCID
Venue
Education and Information Technologies
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2021-05-26
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
7279-7305
ISSN
  • 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7608
DOI
10.1007/s10639-021-10586-0
PMC
PMC8153097
OpenAlex
W3165394891
Cited by
63
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 2
FWCI
14.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
Keywords
emergency remote education, scale development, scale validation, university students, COVID-19 pandemic, distance education, student attitudes, field of study differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review