Cited by 96Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Accounting for Beneficial Effects of Worked Examples in Tutored Problem Solving

Salden, Ron J. C. M., Koedinger, Kenneth R., Renkl, Alexander, Aleven, Vincent, McLaren, Bruce M.·2010·Educational Psychology Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10648-010-9143-6

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous WE studies found that students learned more efficiently with WEs, but they did not learn more, since both groups were exposed to the same learning content.

    “This is consistent with previous WE studies [10,17], where students learned more efficiently with WEs, but they did not learn more, since both groups were exposed to the same learning content.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salden, R. J. C. M., Koedinger, K. R., Renkl, A., Aleven, V., & McLaren, B. M.
Affiliations
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Salden, Ron J. C. M.
Venue
Educational Psychology Review
Published
2010-09-21
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
379-392
ISSN
  • 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-336X
OpenAlex
W2077707062
Cited by
96
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
FWCI
9.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
worked examples, cognitive tutors, cognitive load theory, instructional prompts, immediate feedback, knowledge induction, novice learning, instructional time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review