The DOI matches its Crossref record; 125 of the 125 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Meta-Analysis of Negative Feedback on Intrinsic Motivation
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Research has shown how to provide negative feedback in a way that does not lower a learner's motivation (Fong et al., 2019), how peer comparison can be harnessed for motivation (Mumm & Mutlu, 2011), or how feedback can be given without giving away that errors have been made (Narciss & Huth, 2006).”
From Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Research Agenda (2022) · cites this paper as Fong et al., 2019
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 · Cited by 26,772
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
(1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 19,180
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Miller, K. A. J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1988) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2070638 · Cited by 15,406
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · cited 6×
“…or feedback geared toward task improvement, is known in the field as a variety of terms: formative feedback (Shute 2008), corrective feedback (Hattie and Timperley 2007), constructive feedback (Duijnhouwer et al. 2012; Fong et al. 2016), and effectance-relevant feedback (Deci and Ryan 2016).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialWasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: acore resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
- *Lim, W. (2005). Cognitive and motivational effects of reinforcement: a dual processing model of the impact of evaluation on creativity (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
- *Richards, T. A. (1991). Effects of constructive feedback on perceived competence and intrinsic motivation (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
- *Woodcock, A. J. (1990). The effect of verbal feedback on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence of cricketers (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Vansteenkiste, M., & Soenens, B. (2021) · Motivation Science · doi:10.1037/mot0000194 · Cited by 536
Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Research Agenda
Vu, T., Magis-Weinberg, L., Jansen, B. R. J., van Atteveldt, N., Janssen, T. W. P., Lee, N. C., van der Maas, H. L. J., Raijmakers, M. E. J., Sachisthal, M. S. M., & Meeter, M. (2022) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09616-7 · Cited by 224
Formative assessment as practice: the role of students’ motivation
Leenknecht, M. J. M., Wijnia, L., Köhlen, M., Fryer, L. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Loyens, S. M. M. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1765228 · Cited by 290
Yu, S., Jiang, L. G., & Zhou, N. (2020) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100451 · Cited by 187
A meta-review of the student role in feedback
der Kleij, F. M. V., Adie, L. E., & Cumming, J. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2019.09.005 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Fong, C. J., Patall, E. A., Vasquez, A. C., & Stautberg, S.
- Affiliations
- Texas State University (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fong, Carlton J.
- Venue
- Educational Psychology Review
- Published
- 2018-08-15
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 121-162
- ISSN
- 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-336X
- OpenAlex
- W2886610728
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 125
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Educational Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Psychological Association
- American Educational Research Association
- Association for Psychological Science
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Keywords
- negative feedback, intrinsic motivation, positive feedback, feedback effects, instructional feedback, children, adults, demotivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
