Cited by 477Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyRisk Perception and ManagementPublic Health Policies and Education

Vaccine confidence in the time of COVID-19

Open access
Harrison, Emily A., Wu, Julia W.·2020·European Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

In the early months of the COVID-19 epidemic, some have wondered if the force of this global experience will solve the problem of vaccine refusal that has vexed and preoccupied the global public health community for the last several decades. Drawing on historical and epidemiological analyses, we critique contemporary approaches to reducing vaccine hesitancy and articulate our notion of vaccine confidence as an expanded way of conceptualizing the problem and how to respond to it. Intervening on the rush of vaccine optimism we see pervading present discourse around the COVID-19 epidemic, we call for a re-imagination of the culture of public health and the meaning of vaccine safety regulations. Public confidence in vaccination programs depends on the work they do for the community-social, political, and moral as well as biological. The concept of public health and its programs must be broader than the delivery of the vaccine technology itself. The narrative work and policy actions entailed in actualizing such changes will, we expect, be essential in achieving a true vaccine confidence, however the public reacts to the specific vaccine that may be developed for COVID-19.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10654-020-00634-3

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [35]WHO. Implementation of the International Health Regulations (2005): Report of the Review Committee on the Functioning of the International Health Regulations (2005) in relation to Pandemic (H1N1) 2009. In: Presented to the 64th World Health Assembly, Provisional Agenda Item 13.2; 5 May 2011.
  2. [42]Marks H The progress of experiment: science and therapeutic reform in the United States, 1900–1990 1997 Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrison, E. A., & Wu, J. W.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Harrison, Emily A.
Venue
European Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2020-04
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
325-330
ISSN
  • 0393-2990 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7284
OpenAlex
W3017061487
Cited by
477
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 139 · 2021: 155 · 2020: 32
FWCI
57.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Harvard University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
vaccine confidence, vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal, COVID-19 pandemic, public health policy, narrative works, history of vaccination
MeSH terms
Vaccination Refusal, COVID-19, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Public Opinion, United States, Vaccines, Coronavirus Infections, Epidemics, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review