Cited by 139Sustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisSustainable Development and Environmental PolicyAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact

When experts disagree: the need to rethink indicator selection for assessing sustainability of agriculture

Open access
de Olde, Evelien M., Moller, Henrik, Marchand, Fleur, McDowell, Richard W., MacLeod, Catriona J., Sautier, Marion, Halloy, Stephan, Barber, Andrew +14 more·2017·Environment, Development and Sustainability

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10668-016-9803-x

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Olde, E. M., Moller, H., Marchand, F., McDowell, R. W., MacLeod, C. J., Sautier, M., Halloy, S., Barber, A., Benge, J., Bockstaller, C., Bokkers, E. A. M., de Boer, I. J. M., Legun, K. A., Le Quellec, I., Merfield, C., Oudshoorn, F. W., Reid, J., Schader, C., Szymanski, E., Sørensen, C. A. G., Whitehead, J., & Manhire, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Lincoln University (NZ)
  • AGroécologie, Innovations, teRritoires (FR)
  • Ministry for Primary Industries (NZ)
  • Laboratoire Agronomie et Environnement (FR)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • University of Canterbury (NZ)
  • Forschungsinstitut für Biologischen Landbau (CH)
Venue
Environment, Development and Sustainability
Published
2016-05-11
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
1327-1342
ISSN
  • 1387-585X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2975
OpenAlex
W2388201440
Cited by
139
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environment Development and Sustainability (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago) (submittedVersion)
  • Lincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • AgResearch
Funders
Ministry for Business Innovation and Employment (AGRB1201)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Keywords
sustainable agriculture, sustainability indicators, indicator selection, expert consensus, sustainability assessment framework, indicator prioritization, co-design, transparency, stakeholder trust, sustainability measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review