Cited by 71Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCognitive Abilities and Testing

Brief Report: The Use of WAIS-III in Adults with HFA and Asperger Syndrome

Open access
Spek, Antoinette A., Scholte, Evert M., van Berckelaer-Onnes, Ina A.·2008·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

The WAIS III was administered to 16 adults with high functioning autism (HFA) and 27 adults with Asperger syndrome. Differences between Verbal Intelligence (VIQ) and Performance Intelligence (PIQ) were not found. Processing Speed problems in people with HFA appeared. At the subtest level, the Asperger syndrome group performed weak on Digit Span. Comprehension and Block Design were relative strengths. In the HFA group, performance on Digit-Symbol Coding and Symbol Search was relatively poor. Strengths were found on Information and Matrix Reasoning. The results suggest that the VIQ-PIQ difference cannot distinguish between HFA and Asperger syndrome. WAIS III Factor Scale and Subtest patterning provides a more valid indicator.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-007-0446-5

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Shah and Frith (1993) study has been supported in more recent work by Happé (1994), Ruhl et al. (1995), Siegel et al. (1996), Ehlers et al. (1997), Dennis et al. (1999), Ropar and Mitchell (2001) and Spek et al. (2008).

    “The Shah and Frith (1993) study has been supported in more recent work by Happé (1994), Ruhl, Werner, and Poustka (1995), Siegel, Minshew, and Goldstein (1996), Ehlers et al. (1997), Dennis et al. (1999), Ropar and Mitchell (2001) and Spek, Scholte, and van Berckelaer-Onnes (2008).”

    From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Spek et al., 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spek, A. A., Scholte, E. M., & van Berckelaer-Onnes, I. A.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Spek, Antoinette A.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2007-09-19
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
782-787
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W1979793123
Cited by
71
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universiteit Leiden
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
high-functioning autism, Asperger syndrome, WAIS-III, intelligence testing, verbal intelligence, performance intelligence, processing speed, digit span, autistic adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Severity of Illness Index, Wechsler Scales, Asperger Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review