Cited by 48Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentLanguage Development and Disorders

Brief Report: Inner Speech Impairment in Children with Autism is Associated with Greater Nonverbal than Verbal Skills

Open access
Lidstone, Jane S. M., Fernyhough, Charles, Meins, Elizabeth, Whitehouse, Andrew J. O.·2009·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

We present a new analysis of Whitehouse, Maybery, and Durkin's (2006, Experiment 3) data on inner speech in children with autism (CWA). Because inner speech development is thought to depend on linguistically mediated social interaction, we hypothesized that children with both autism and a nonverbal > verbal (NV > V) skills profile would show the greatest inner speech impairment. CWA and typically developing controls (n = 23 in each group) undertook a timed mathematical task-switching test, known to benefit from inner speech use. Participants completed the task with and without articulatory suppression (AS), which disrupts inner speech. The hypothesis was supported: AS interference varied with cognitive profile among CWA but not among controls. Only the NV > V autism group showed no AS interference, indicating an inner speech impairment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-009-0731-6

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only ASD participants showed a significant effect of cognitive profile, with NV > V participants showing the least interference from articulatory suppression on an arithmetic switching task.

    “This prediction was confirmed: only ASD participants showed a significant effect of cognitive profile, with NV > V participants showing the least interference from articulatory suppression on an arithmetic switching task.”

    From Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015) · cites this paper as Lidstone, Fernyhough, Meins, and Whitehouse (2009)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lidstone, J. S. M., Fernyhough, C., Meins, E., & Whitehouse, A. J. O.
Affiliations
  • Durham University (GB)
  • The Kids Research Institute Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Lidstone, Jane S. M.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2009-03-28
Volume
39
Issue
8
Pages
1222-1225
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2003857376
Cited by
48
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
inner speech, autism spectrum disorder, articulatory suppression, task switching, cognitive profile, children with autism
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Child, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Mathematics, Neuropsychological Tests, Nonverbal Communication, Severity of Illness Index, Speech Disorders, Thinking, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review