Cited by 139Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentSocial Representations and Identity

Inner speech impairments in autism

Whitehouse, Andrew J.O., Maybery, Murray T., Durkin, Kevin·2006·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Three experiments investigated the role of inner speech deficit in cognitive performances of children with autism. Methods: Experiment 1 compared children with autism with ability‐matched controls on a verbal recall task presenting pictures and words. Experiment 2 used pictures for which the typical names were either single syllable or multisyllable. Two encoding conditions manipulated the use of verbal encoding. Experiment 3 employed a task‐switching paradigm for which performance has been shown to be contingent upon inner speech. Results: In Experiment 1, children with autism demonstrated a lower picture‐superiority effect compared to controls. In Experiment 2, the children with autism showed a lower word‐length effect when pictures were presented alone, but a more substantial word‐length effect in a condition requiring overt labelling. In Experiment 3, articulatory suppression affected the task‐switching performance of the control participants only. Conclusions: Individuals with autism have limitations in their use of inner speech.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01624.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Atypical ToM has for a long time been considered a core feature of autism spectrum disorder, but differences in inner speech in autism have only been studied relatively recently.

    “As a second example, atypical ToM has for a long time been considered a core feature of autism spectrum disorder (Baron-Cohen et al., 1985), but differences in inner speech in autism have only been studied relatively recently (Whitehouse et al., 2006; Wallace et al., 2009; Holland and Low, 2010).”

    From The brain's conversation with itself: neural substrates of dialogic inner speech (2016) · cites this paper as Whitehouse et al., 2006

  • To our knowledge, just four studies have examined task-switching in autism, and none found performance deficits.

    “To our knowledge, only four studies have investigated task-switching in people with autism and none of them reported performance deficits [40–43].”

    From The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism (2009) · cites this paper as [43]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whitehouse, A. J. O., Maybery, M. T., & Durkin, K.
Affiliations
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
Corresponding author
Whitehouse, Andrew J.O.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-04-26
Volume
47
Issue
8
Pages
857-865
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W1652226287
Cited by
139
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
Keywords
inner speech, autism spectrum disorder, verbal working memory, picture superiority effect, word length effect, verbal encoding, task switching, articulatory suppression, children with autism
MeSH terms
Attention, Autistic Disorder, Child, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Intelligence Tests, Internal-External Control, Language Development Disorders, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Problem Solving, Mental Recall, Reference Values, Semantics, Speech Disorders, Verbal Behavior, Verbal Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review