Cited by 231Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 63 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

WISC-IV Profile in High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorders: Impaired Processing Speed is Associated with Increased Autism Communication Symptoms and Decreased Adaptive Communication Abilities

Open access

Abstract

Changes in the Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children-IV (WISC-IV) may affect the IQ profile characteristic of autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Moreover, the association of particular component cognitive abilities (unlike overall IQ) with symptomatology and adaptive functioning in ASD remains unclear. This archival study characterizes the WISC-IV IQ profile among 56 high-functioning (IQ > 70) children with ASD and correlates WISC-IV performance with ASD and ADHD symptomatology and adaptive functioning. The ASD WISC-IV profile included strengths on Matrix Reasoning and Similarities, weaknesses on Comprehension (which correlated negatively with social symptoms) and the subtests comprising the Processing Speed Index (Coding, Symbol Search). Processing speed task performance correlated negatively with communication symptoms and positively with communication abilities, indicating its importance to functional outcomes in ASD.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-011-1289-7

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

40 Not checked yet · 33 Own result · 15 Own interpretation · 7 Own method · 3 No basis given · 1 Sources not found

Verify all 60 references — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 38
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 40
63 of 63
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Missing data across measures did not bias the correlational results.

    “Data were collected as part of a clinical evaluation, thus not all participants received all measures.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The ASD diagnostic subtypes (autistic disorder, Asperger syndrome, and PDD-NOS) can be combined for the WISC-IV profile and correlation analyses.

    “Participants are a clinically referred sample of 56 consecutive cases of children (46 [82.1%] males) with an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis (high-functioning autism n=22; Asperger syndrome n=22; PDD-NOS n=12)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The study had sufficient statistical power to detect associations between IQ and ADHD symptoms.

    “No significant correlations were found between IQ scores and ADHD Rating Scale scores.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The archival clinically referred sample is representative of high-functioning children with ASD generally.

    “Participants are a clinically referred sample of 56 consecutive cases of children (46 [82.1%] males) with an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    ADOS and Vineland scores were contemporaneous with the WISC-IV assessment.

    “For ASD symptomatology, only the ADOS social and communication scores were utilized because ADI scores are not contemporaneous with IQ assessment”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Wechsler processing speed tasks are primarily visuomotor.

    “Given that the Wechsler processing speed tasks are primarily visuomotor”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The ADOS and Vineland measures validly capture communication and social abilities in this sample.

    “ADOS communication symptoms were inversely correlated with verbal abilities”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentt(55) = -5.64reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(55) = −5.64, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(55) = -5.49reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(55) = −5.49, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(55) = -4.15reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(55) = −4.15, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(55) = -4.05reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(55) = −4.05, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(55) = 3.54reported p = .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(55) = 3.54, p = .001”

  • Consistentt(55) = 2.28reported p = .03 · recomputed p = .027

    “t(55) = 2.28, p = .03”

  • ConsistentF(3, 52) = 18.32reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(3,52) = 18.32, p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(7, 55) = 19.8reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(7,55) = 19.8, p < .001”

8 of 8

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., & Risi, S. (1999). Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule–WPS (ADOS-WPS). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
  2. Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., & Balla, D. A. (2005). Vineland adaptive behavior scales: Second edition (Vineland II), survey interview form/caregiver rating form. Livonia, MN: Pearson Assessments.
  3. Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-fourth edition (WISC-IV). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 231

Metadata

Authors
Oliveras-Rentas, R. E., Kenworthy, L., Roberson, R. B., Martin, A., & Wallace, G. L.
Affiliations
  • Children's National (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Wallace, Gregory L.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2011-06-03
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
655-664
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2004828747
Cited by
231
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (ZIAMH002920)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, high-functioning autism, WISC-IV, processing speed, adaptive behavior, ADHD symptoms, matrix reasoning, Similarities subtest, Comprehension subtest, symbol search, Coding subtest, children
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Aptitude, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Communication, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Social Behavior, Wechsler Scales, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-05, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-05 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review