Cited by 243Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Prevalence and Onset of Regression within Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Meta-analytic Review

Barger, Brian D., Campbell, Jonathan M., McDonough, Jaimi D.·2013·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Rates and onset of regression were meta-analyzed from 85 articles representing 29,035 participants with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Overall prevalence rate for regression was 32.1, 95 % CI [29.5, 34.8] occurring at mean of 1.78 years, 95 % CI [1.67, 1.89]. Regression prevalence rates differed according to four types of regression: language regression, 24.9 %; language/social regression, 38.1 %; mixed regression, 32.5 %; and unspecified regression, 39.1 %. Regression prevalence also differed according to sampling method: population-based prevalence was 21.8 %, clinic-based prevalence was 33.6 %, and parent survey-based prevalence was 40.8 %. Risk of regression was equal for males and females, but higher for individuals diagnosed with autism versus another ASD. Later age of regression onset was predicted by older age of child.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-012-1621-x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive profiles based on the relative discrepancy between verbal and non-verbal skills in ASD have been identified.

    “cognitive profiles based on the relative discrepancy between verbal and non-verbal skills in ASD have been identified [50,51].”
  • A recent meta-analysis suggested a mean prevalence of parent-reported regression of 32%.

    “A recent meta-analysis suggested a mean prevalence of parentreported regression of 32% (Barger et al. 2013), but rates vary depending on how stringent a definition is employed (Hansen et al. 2008, Stefanatos 2008).”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barger, B. D., Campbell, J. M., & McDonough, J. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Campbell, Jonathan M.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2012-08-02
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
817-828
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2005515221
Cited by
243
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, regression analysis, language regression, social regression, prevalence, risk factors, sex differences, diagnostic subtypes
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Autistic Disorder, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Humans, Regression, Psychology, Time Factors, Prevalence, Age of Onset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review