Cited by 192Child Nutrition and Feeding IssuesAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchCeliac Disease Research and Management

The gluten-free/casein-free diet: a double-blind challenge trial in children with autism

Hyman, Susan L., Stewart, Patricia A., Foley, Jennifer, Cain, Usa, Peck, Robin, Morris, Danielle D., Wang, Hongyue, Smith, Tristram·2016·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

To obtain information on the safety and efficacy of the gluten-free/casein-free (GFCF) diet, we placed 14 children with autism, age 3-5 years, on the diet for 4-6 weeks and then conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled challenge study for 12 weeks while continuing the diet, with a 12-week follow-up. Dietary challenges were delivered via weekly snacks that contained gluten, casein, gluten and casein, or placebo. With nutritional counseling, the diet was safe and well-tolerated. However, dietary challenges did not have statistically significant effects on measures of physiologic functioning, behavior problems, or autism symptoms. Although these findings must be interpreted with caution because of the small sample size, the study does not provide evidence to support general use of the GFCF diet.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-015-2564-9

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anecdotal reports suggest an improvement in GI and/or behavioral symptoms in individuals on gluten- and/or casein-free diets, but these findings have not been confirmed in double-blind placebo-controlled trials.

    “Though anecdotal reports suggest an improvement in GI and/or behavioral symptoms in individuals on gluten- and/or casein-free diets, these findings have not been confirmed in double-blind placebo-controlled trials 45.”

    From Gastrointestinal Issues and Autism Spectrum Disorder (2020) · cites this paper as [45]

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hyman, S. L., Stewart, P. A., Foley, J., Cain, U., Peck, R., Morris, D. D., Wang, H., & Smith, T.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Hyman, Susan L.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2015-09-05
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
205-220
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W1874135929
Cited by
192
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 3
FWCI
11.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NIH/NIMH (U54 MH066397)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
Keywords
gluten-free casein-free diet, autism spectrum disorder, dietary intervention, gluten, casein, children, nutritional safety, behavioral problems, autism symptoms
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Caseins, Child, Preschool, Double-Blind Method, Female, Glutens, Humans, Male, Diet, Gluten-Free

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review