Cited by 138Child Nutrition and Feeding IssuesAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Nutritional and Dietary Interventions for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review

Sathe, Nila, Andrews, Jeffrey C., McPheeters, Melissa L., Warren, Zachary E.·2017·PEDIATRICS

Abstract

CONTEXT: Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) frequently use special diets or receive nutritional supplements to treat ASD symptoms. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dietary interventions or nutritional supplements in ASD. DATA SOURCES: Databases, including Medline and PsycINFO. STUDY SELECTION: Two investigators independently screened studies against predetermined criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: One investigator extracted data with review by a second investigator. Investigators independently assessed the risk of bias and strength of evidence (SOE) (ie, confidence in the estimate of effects). RESULTS: , levocarnitine) reported some improvements in symptom severity (insufficient SOE). Studies evaluating gluten/casein-free diets reported some parent-rated improvements in communication and challenging behaviors; however, data were inadequate to make conclusions about the body of evidence (insufficient SOE). Studies of gluten- or casein-containing challenge foods reported no effects on behavior or gastrointestinal symptoms with challenge foods (insufficient SOE); 1 RCT reported no effects of camel's milk on ASD severity (insufficient SOE). Harms were disparate. LIMITATIONS: Studies were small and short-term, and there were few fully categorized populations or concomitant interventions. CONCLUSIONS: There is little evidence to support the use of nutritional supplements or dietary therapies for children with ASD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2017-0346

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sathe, N., Andrews, J. C., McPheeters, M. L., & Warren, Z. E.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
PEDIATRICS
Published
2017-05-26
Volume
139
Issue
6
Pages
e20170346
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2619358396
Cited by
138
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5
FWCI
11.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, dietary intervention, dietary supplements, gluten-free diet, casein-free diet, camel milk, L-carnitine, symptom severity, behavioral problems, gastrointestinal symptoms, children
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child, Humans, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Dietary Supplements, Diet, Gluten-Free, Enzyme Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review