Cited by 172Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersSexual Differentiation and Disorders

Brief report: Sex/gender differences in symptomology and camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum disorder

Open access
Schuck, Rachel K., Flores, Ryan E., Fung, Lawrence K.·2019·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is more prevalent in males than females. Previous research indicates females camouflage ASD symptoms more than males, potentially contributing to the difference in prevalence. This study investigated sex/gender differences in behavioral phenotypes in 17 males and 11 females with ASD, as well camouflaging in ASD, in an attempt to partially replicate findings from Lai et al. (Autism 21(6):690-702, 2017). Overall ASD symptoms were measured by the autism spectrum quotient (AQ). Mean AQ in females with ASD was higher than males with ASD, with the difference approaching statistical significance. Camouflaging was found to be more common in females with ASD, and not associated to social phobia. Furthermore, camouflaging correlated negatively with emotional expressivity in females, but not males, with ASD. These findings strengthen previous findings regarding camouflaging being more common in females and add to the literature on how camouflaging may be different in females versus males.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-019-03998-y

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emerging quantitative research examining associations between camouflaging and anxiety have yielded inconsistent results.

    “Emerging quantitative research examining associations between camouflaging and anxiety (e.g. Cage & Troxell-Whitman, 2019; Lai et al., 2017; Schuck et al., 2019) have yielded inconsistent results.”

    From Camouflaging in an everyday social context: An interpersonal recall study (2021) · cites this paper as Schuck et al., 2019

  • Two internal-external discrepancy studies found that autistic women had higher camouflaging scores than autistic men.

    “The two studies investigating what they termed sex/gender differences using the internalexternal discrepancy approach found that autistic women demonstrated higher camouflaging scores than autistic men (Lai et al., 2017;Schuck, et al., 2019).”

    From Camouflaging in autism: A systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as Schuck, et al., 2019

  • One adult study found no relationship between camouflaging and executive functioning.

    “Schuck et al. (2019) found no relationship between camouflaging and executive functioning”

    From Camouflaging in autism: A systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as Schuck et al., 2019

  • No relationship was found between camouflaging scores and social anxiety symptoms for either sex or gender.

    “Schuck et al. (2019) found no relationship between camouflaging scores and social anxiety symptoms for either sex/gender.”

    From Camouflaging in autism: A systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as Schuck et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schuck, R. K., Flores, R. E., & Fung, L. K.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Fung, Lawrence K.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2019-04-03
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
2597-2604
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2929474056
Cited by
172
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6
FWCI
10.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K08MH111750)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, sex differences, gender differences, camouflaging, Autism Spectrum Quotient, emotional expressivity, social anxiety disorder, behavioral phenotypes
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Sex Factors, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review