Cited by 177Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchSexual Differentiation and DisordersGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Attenuation of Typical Sex Differences in 800 Adults with Autism vs. 3,900 Controls

Open access
Baron-Cohen, Simon, Cassidy, Sarah, Auyeung, Bonnie, Allison, Carrie, Achoukhi, Maryam, Robertson, Sarah, Pohl, Alexa, Lai, Meng-Chuan·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Sex differences have been reported in autistic traits and systemizing (male advantage), and empathizing (female advantage) among typically developing individuals. In individuals with autism, these cognitive-behavioural profiles correspond to predictions from the "extreme male brain" (EMB) theory of autism (extreme scores on autistic traits and systemizing, below average on empathizing). Sex differences within autism, however, have been under-investigated. Here we show in 811 adults (454 females) with autism and 3,906 age-matched typical control adults (2,562 females) who completed the Empathy Quotient (EQ), the Systemizing Quotient-Revised (SQ-R), and the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ), that typical females on average scored higher on the EQ, typical males scored higher on the SQ-R and AQ, and both males and females with autism showed a shift toward the extreme of the "male profile" on these measures and in the distribution of "brain types" (the discrepancy between standardized EQ and SQ-R scores). Further, normative sex differences are attenuated but not abolished in adults with autism. The findings provide strong support for the EMB theory of autism, and highlight differences between males and females with autism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0102251

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The elevation in restricted and repetitive behavior in male children and male adults with and without ASD is consistent with a male focus on regularity in the behavior of non-social objects and events.

    “The elevation in restricted and repetitive behavior in male children and male adults with and without ASD is consistent with a male focus on regularity in the behavior of non-social objects and events [19, 42, 43].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baron-Cohen, S., Cassidy, S., Auyeung, B., Allison, C., Achoukhi, M., Robertson, S., Pohl, A., & Lai, M.-C.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • National Health Service (GB)
Corresponding author
Lai, Meng-Chuan
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-07-16
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
e102251
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132880989
Cited by
177
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 2
FWCI
11.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Coventry University Open Collections (Coventry university) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • The Open Collections (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Medical Research Council
  • Wolfson College, University of Cambridge
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, sex differences, extreme male brain theory, autistic traits, systemizing, empathizing, Empathy Quotient, Autism Spectrum Quotient, autistic adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Autistic Disorder, Cognition, Empathy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Characteristics, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review