Cited by 19Cognitive Abilities and TestingAging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Functions and Memory

The impact of processing speed training on working memory in old adults.

Peng, Huamao, Wen, Jing, Wang, Dahua, Gao, Yue·2012·Journal of Adult Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10804-012-9142-6

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The active control group performed the same training protocol as the experimental groups but engaged in activities relying on perceptual abilities and progressively increasing speed demands without increments in executive load.

    “AC performed the same training protocol as their experimental counterparts, but they engaged in activities that relied on perceptual abilities and progressively increased their speed demands, without increments in executive load (Peng et al., 2012; Takeuchi and Kawashima, 2012; Lawlor-Savage and Goghari, 2016).”

    From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Peng et al., 2012

  • No impact of processing speed training has been found on working memory.

    “no impact of processing speed training has been found on working memory [34].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peng, H., Wen, J., Wang, D., & Gao, Y.
Affiliations
Beijing Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Peng, Huamao
Venue
Journal of Adult Development
Published
2012-02-15
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
150-157
ISSN
  • 1068-0667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3440
OpenAlex
W2015521727
Cited by
19
References
50
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Adult Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
processing speed, working memory, cognitive aging, older adults, speed training, transfer effects, executive attention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review