Cited by 24Seaweed-derived Bioactive CompoundsPhytochemistry Medicinal Plant ApplicationsEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Evaluation of the toxicity of Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis extract

Hutadilok-Towatana, Nongporn, Reanmongkol, Wantana, Panichayupakaranant, Pharkphoom·2010·Journal of Applied Phycology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10811-009-9499-5

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Urea and bicarbonate are the primary components of Spirulina growing media because carbonate is not used in the cultivation process.

    “Since carbonate is not used in the cultivation process, urea and bicarbonate are the primary components of the growing media.”
  • If fertilizer-grade chemicals are used instead of low-cost substitutes, potassium content can be raised, but must not exceed five times sodium concentration.

    “If fertilizer-grade chemicals rather than low-cost substitutes are employed, the potassium content can be raised; however, this must be completed with caution so that it does not go over five times the concentration of sodium.”
  • A filter or mesh cloth with pores no smaller than 50 microns can collect spirulina from the medium with an efficiency of around 95%.

    “In addition, a filter or a mesh cloth with pores no smaller than 50 microns was utilized in order to collect the spirulina from the medium with an extremely high efficiency of around 95% [1,40].”
  • The DSI-EC granted 'Class A' to Spirulina after rigorous analysis of clinical case reports, animal toxicological data and adverse event reports, making it safe for human consumption when grown under controlled conditions.

    “Moreover, the Dietary Supplements Information Expert Committee (DSI-EC) of the United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) granted ‘Class A’ to Spirulina after rigorous analysis of clinical case reports, animal toxicological data and adverse event reports, thus making it safe for human consumption [6] when grown under controlled conditions [4,7].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hutadilok-Towatana, N., Reanmongkol, W., & Panichayupakaranant, P.
Affiliations
Prince of Songkla University (TH)
Venue
Journal of Applied Phycology
Published
2010-01-21
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
599-605
ISSN
  • 0921-8971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5176
OpenAlex
W2150572070
Cited by
24
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Phycology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
Spirulina platensis, Spirulina, methanol extract, acute toxicity, subchronic toxicity, oral toxicity, hematology, clinical chemistry, histopathology, cyanobacteria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review