Cited by 54Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFamily and Disability Support ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Parental behavior comparisons between parents of children with autism spectrum disorder and parents of children without autism Spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis

Ku, Byungmo, Stinson, Jodi Dawn, MacDonald, Megan·2019·Journal of Child and Family Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10826-019-01412-w

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ku, B., Stinson, J. D., & MacDonald, M.
Affiliations
Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Ku, Byungmo
Venue
Journal of Child and Family Studies
Published
2019-04-18
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
1445-1460
ISSN
  • 1062-1024 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2843
OpenAlex
W2938420927
Cited by
54
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Child and Family Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, parental behavior, parenting styles, parental warmth, parental behavioral control, negative parenting, parental communication style, child language acquisition, family intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review