Cited by 10Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

An examination of pre-service mathematics teachers’ course-taking, beliefs, and preferred assessment practices

Open access
Wellberg, Sarah·2025·Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

Abstract

This study uses structural equation modeling to investigate the relationships between pre-service teachers’ (PSTs’) course-taking history, beliefs about mathematics, beliefs about students’ mathematical ability, and opinions about (1) how student errors should be addressed when they occur and (2) how much emphasis should be given to various forms of assessment. The results indicate that some types of courses are strongly associated with beliefs about the nature of mathematics. Specifically, PSTs who have taken more mathematics courses are more likely to see mathematics as a set of rules. PSTs’ views about mathematics strongly predict their beliefs about who can do high-level mathematics, how they think student errors should be addressed, and which forms of assessment they think are most appropriate. Implications for teacher preparation programs are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10857-024-09640-8

Cites

144 of 144 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies on preservice teachers' beliefs, assessment preferences, and formative assessment in mathematics education suggest that conventional grading practices often fail to capture subtle but meaningful differences in learning and professional growth.

    “Studies on preservice teachers' beliefs, assessment preferences, and formative assessment in mathematics education suggest that conventional grading practices often fail to capture subtle but meaningful differences in learning and professional growth”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 149 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wellberg, S.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Wellberg, Sarah
Venue
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
Published
2024-06-18
Volume
28
Issue
7
Pages
1567-1606
ISSN
  • 1386-4416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1820
OpenAlex
W4399786236
Cited by
10
References
149
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5
FWCI
12.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
pre-service mathematics teachers, mathematics beliefs, student errors, assessment practices, teacher education curriculum, nature of mathematics, mathematics teacher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review