Cited by 242Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessMathematics Education and Pedagogy

Identifying cognitive engagement in the mathematics classroom

Helme, Sue, Clarke, David·2001·Mathematics Education Research Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03217103

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Indicators of cognitive engagement in collaborative activities include questioning, completing peer utterances, exchanging ideas, making evaluative comments, giving directions, explanations, or information, justifying an argument, and making gestures and facial expressions.

    “Helme and Clarke (2001) identified a range of indicators of cognitive engagement in collaborative activities, including questioning; completing peer utterances; exchanging ideas; making evaluative comments; giving directions, explanations, or information; justifying an argument; and making gestures and facial expressions.”

    From Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom (2016) · cites this paper as Helme and Clarke (2001)

  • Research in mainstream classrooms has found different sets of indicators of cognitive engagement for different curriculum areas, including mathematics and reading.

    “Research conducted in mainstream classrooms has already found different sets of indicators of cognitive engagement for different curriculum areas including mathematics (Helme & Clarke, 2001) and reading (Guthrie, Wigfield, & You, 2012).”

    From Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom (2016) · cites this paper as Helme & Clarke, 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Helme, S., & Clarke, D.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Mathematics Education Research Journal
Published
2001-09
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
133-153
ISSN
  • 1033-2170 (ISSN-L)
  • 2211-050X
OpenAlex
W1970461377
Cited by
242
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mathematics Education Research Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
cognitive engagement, mathematics classroom, student engagement, linguistic indicators, behavioural indicators, classroom situation, mathematical tasks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review