The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Concurrent Validity of the Child Behavior Checklist DSM-Oriented Scales: Correspondence with DSM Diagnoses and Comparison to Syndrome Scales
Open accessAbstract
This study used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology and discriminative analyses to examine the correspondence of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) rationally-derived DSM-oriented scales and empirically-derived syndrome scales with clinical diagnoses in a clinic-referred sample of children and adolescents (N = 476). Although results demonstrated that the CBCL Anxiety, Affective, Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity, Oppositional and Conduct Problems DSM-oriented scales corresponded significantly with related clinical diagnoses derived from parent-based structured interviews, these DSM-oriented scales did not evidence significantly greater correspondence with clinical diagnoses than the syndrome scales in all cases but one. The DSM-oriented Anxiety Problems scale was the only scale that evidenced significantly greater correspondence with diagnoses above its syndrome scale counterpart -the Anxious/Depressed scale. The recently developed and rationally-derived DSM-oriented scales thus generally do not add incremental clinical utility above that already afforded by the syndrome scales with respect to corresponding with diagnoses. Implications of these findings are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“The Revised Children’s Anxiety and Depression Scale-Child and Parent version have exhibited strong and acceptable internal consistency, respectively [142-144].”
From Family Support Protocol for Adolescent Internalizing Disorders: Protocol for a Pre-Post Quantitative Treatment Development Study (2024) · cites this paper as [144]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“However, for the majority of outcome variables, parents responded to the Child Behavior Checklist, which demonstrates strong psychometric validity [33].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M., & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. (1988) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531595 · Cited by 22,649
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,385
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Ghosh, S., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1988) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269814 · Cited by 4,730
Integrative Guide for the 1991 CBCL/4-18, Ysr, and Trf Profiles
Achenbach, T. M. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,454
DSM-Oriented and empirically based approaches to constructing scales from the same item pools
Achenbach, T. M., Dumenci, L., & Rescorla, L. A. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp3203_02 · Cited by 615
Panic: Psychological Perspectives
Rachman, S., & Maser, J. D. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 520
A psychometric analysis of the child behavior checklist DSM-oriented scales
Nakamura, B. J., Ebesutani, C., Bernstein, A., & Chorpita, B. F. (2009) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-008-9119-8 · Cited by 374
Self-citationChen, W. J., Faraone, S. V., Biederman, J., & Tsuang, M. T. (1994) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.62.5.1017 · Cited by 314
Ebesutani, C. K., Bernstein, A., Nakamura, B. J., Chorpita, B. F., & Weisz, J. R. (2009) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-009-9363-8 · Cited by 222
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Achenbach, T. M. & Edelbrock, C. S. (1983). Manual for the child behavior checklist and revised behavior profile. Burlington: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.
- SPSS, Inc. (2006). S.P.S.S. 15.0 Base User's Guide: Prentice Hall.
- Weller, E., Weller, R., Teare, M., & Fristad, M. (1999). Parent Version-Children's Interview for Psychiatric Syndromes (P-ChIPS). Washington: American Psychiatric Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Comorbidity of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents: 20 years after
Cummings, C. M., Caporino, N. E., & Kendall, P. C. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0034733 · Cited by 1,028
Buss, C., Davis, E. P., Shahbaba, B., Pruessner, J. C., Head, K., & Sandman, C. A. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1201295109 · Cited by 652
Reduced nucleus accumbens reactivity and adolescent depression following early-life stress
Goff, B., Gee, D. G., Telzer, E. H., Humphreys, K. L., Gabard-Durnam, L., Flannery, J., & Tottenham, N. (2013) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.12.010 · Cited by 234
Ebesutani, C. K., Bernstein, A., Nakamura, B. J., Chorpita, B. F., & Weisz, J. R. (2009) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-009-9363-8 · Cited by 222
Self-citationKobrosly, R. W., Evans, S. F., Miodovnik, A., Barrett, E. S., Thurston, S. W., Calafat, A. M., & Swan, S. H. (2014) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1307063 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- The Research Network on Youth Mental Health, Ebesutani, C., Bernstein, A., Nakamura, B. J., Chorpita, B. F., Higa-McMillan, C. K., & Weisz, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- University of Hawaii at Hilo (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ebesutani, Chad
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
- Published
- 2009-11-27
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 373-384
- ISSN
- 0164-0305 (ISSN-L)
- 0882-2689
- 1573-3505
- PMC
- PMC2914253
- OpenAlex
- W2096210298
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 9.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- Child Behavior Checklist, concurrent validity, emotional problems, children and adolescents, parent-report measures, discriminant validity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review