Cited by 10Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Difficulties in interpersonal regulation of emotions (DIRE) questionnaire: psychometric properties of the Italian version and associations with psychopathological symptoms

Open access
Messina, Irene, Spataro, Pietro, Grecucci, Alessandro, Marogna, Cristina, Dixon-Gordon, Katherine L.·2022·Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Abstract

The goal of this research was to validate an Italian adaptation of the questionnaire Difficulties in Interpersonal Regulation of Emotions (DIRE) and to investigate its associations with psychopathology. An Italian sample (N = 630) completed the DIRE and the Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90). We tested the factorial structure of the DIRE using explorative and confirmatory factorial analyses; we analysed the convergent validity in terms of zero-order correlations with SCL-90 dimensions; and, we conducted multiple regressions to test the predictivity of DIRE factors on specific SCL-90 dimensions. The Italian DIRE replicated the four-factor structure of the original measure, with two interpersonal (Vent and Reassurance-seek) and two intrapersonal (Accept and Avoid) factors. Interpersonal factors resulted correlated with SCL-90 global indexes of psychopathology. Moreover, specific association between DIRE factors and SCL-90 dimensions were found. The Italian DIRE is a reliable and valid measure to evaluate clinically-relevant forms of emotion dysregulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10862-022-09992-6

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interpersonal venting and excessive reassurance-seeking are considered maladaptive IER strategies that can lead to negative interpersonal outcomes such as rejection, conflicts, or abandonment.

    “interpersonal venting and excessive reassurance-seeking are considered maladaptive IER strategies (Dixon-Gordon et al., 2018a; Messina et al., 2022), as they can lead to negative interpersonal outcomes, such as rejection, conflicts, or abandonment.”

    From Risk and protective factors in academic burnout: exploring the mediating role of interpersonal emotion regulation in the link with social support (2025) · cites this paper as Messina et al., 2022

    The Introduction identifies venting and reassurance-seeking as potentially maladaptive interpersonal emotion-regulation strategies. The Discussion says excessive reassurance-seeking may deteriorate relationships and venting is thought to reduce social support and increase isolation, but it does not specify rejection, conflicts, or abandonment as outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Italian version of the DIRE had good internal consistencies for Vent (α = 0.76) and Reassurance-Seek (α = 0.87).

    “In the validation study of the Italian version of the DIRE good internal consistencies have been reported for both the Vent (α = 76) and Reassurance- Seek (α = 0.87) subscales (Messina et al., 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [12]12. Grecucci, A., De Pisapia, N., Venuti, P., Palladino, M. P., & Job, R. (2015b). Baseline and strategic mindful regulation: behavioral and physiological investigation. Plos One, 10(1), e0116541
  2. [14]14. Grecucci, A., Thneuick, A., Frederickson, J., & Job, R. (2015c). Mechanisms of social emotion regulation: from neuroscience to psychotherapy. In M. L. Bryant (Ed.), Handbook on Emo- tion Regulation: Processes, Cognitive Effects and Social Conse- quences. Nova Publishing

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Messina, I., Spataro, P., Grecucci, A., Marogna, C., & Dixon-Gordon, K. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Trento (IT)
  • Mercatorum University (IT)
  • University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Messina, Irene
Venue
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Published
2022-08-03
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
1126-1134
ISSN
  • 0164-0305 (ISSN-L)
  • 0882-2689
  • 1573-3505
OpenAlex
W4289545159
Cited by
10
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
emotion regulation, emotional dysregulation, psychopathology, Italian adaptation, questionnaire validation, factor structure, convergent validity, interpersonal factors, intrapersonal factors, SCL-90, psychometric properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review