Cited by 39Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Perceived spouse responses to pain: the level of agreement in couple dyads and the role of catastrophizing, marital satisfaction, and depression

Open access
Pence, Laura, Cano, Annmarie, Thorn, Beverly, Ward, L. Charles·2006·Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to examine whether individuals with chronic pain ("participants") and their spouses agree on perceptions of solicitous, distracting, and punishing spouse responses to pain. The second aim was to examine the role of participant catastrophizing (a negative mental set about pain), participant and spouse marital satisfaction, and participant and spouse depression in participant perceptions of spouse responses, spouse perceptions of their responses, and agreement between participants and spouses. Individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain and their spouses (N=108 couples) completed questionnaire packets. Examination of overall group averages (participants vs. spouses) indicated little or no differences between participant and spouse ratings. Examination of individual agreement in participant and spouse ratings indicated substantial disagreement. The proposed moderators predicted both participant and spouse perceptions and jointly made minor contributions to dyad agreement. Although neither participant nor spouse perceptions of spouse responses are necessarily a reflection of actual behavior, the lack of agreement in this study suggests it may not be valid to use only patient perceptions in research related to spouse responses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10865-006-9073-4

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies indicate that ignoring pain does not predict pain-related outcomes such as pain interference, disability, or pain severity.

    “the majority of studies indicate that ignoring pain does not predict pain-related outcomes such as pain interference, disability, or pain severity 291, 292.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pence, L., Cano, A., Thorn, B., & Ward, L. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2006-09-08
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
511-522
ISSN
  • 0160-7715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3521
OpenAlex
W2020765269
Cited by
39
References
49
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Human Biology (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH066975)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
chronic pain, couple dyads, perceived spousal support, pain catastrophizing, marital satisfaction, depression, musculoskeletal pain, spousal caregiving
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Michigan, Middle Aged, Pain, Personal Satisfaction, Regression Analysis, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Multivariate Analysis, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review