Cited by 54Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and ManagementKnowledge Management and Sharing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

It is Better to Receive than to Give: Advice Network Effects on Job and Work-Unit Attachment

Zagenczyk, Thomas J., Murrell, Audrey J.·2009·Journal of Business and Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10869-009-9095-3

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 67 references

3 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bergeron, D. M. (2004). The paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good soldiers at what cost? Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbia University.
  2. Bishop, J. W., & Scott, K. D. (1996). Multiple foci of commitment in a work team environment. Proceedings of the 1996 Academy of Management Meeting: Cincinnati, OH.
  3. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (1999). UCINET 6.0 version 1.00. Natick: Analytic Technologies.
  4. Cross, R., & Parker, A. (2004). The hidden power of networks. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press Books.
  5. Graen, G., & Cashman, J. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership frontiers (pp. 143–166). Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
  6. Higgins, M. C., & Kram, K. E. (2001b). Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 264–298. · DOI
  7. Ilgen, D., & Pulakos, E. (1999). The changing nature of performance. USA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 54

Metadata

Authors
Zagenczyk, T. J., & Murrell, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Clemson University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Zagenczyk, Thomas J.
Venue
Journal of Business and Psychology
Published
2009-02-26
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
139-152
ISSN
  • 0889-3268 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-353X
OpenAlex
W2157256887
Cited by
54
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Business and Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
Keywords
advice-giving, job involvement, organizational commitment, social network ties, employee attitudes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review