The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Employees’ adaptability and perceptions of change-related uncertainty: implications for perceived organizational support, job satisfaction, and performance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Crucially, POS has been identified as a potential mediator in the relationship between teacher workload and wellbeing. A supportive organizational environment may decrease the negative effects of high workload on teachers, contributing to increased job satisfaction and positive work engagement (Alfes et al., 2013; Cullen et al., 2014).”
From Exploring the impact of workload, organizational support, and work engagement on teachers' psychological wellbeing: a structural equation modeling approach (2024) · cites this paper as Cullen et al., 2014
Citations
Cites
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03206553 · Cited by 17,383
Exchange and Power in Social Life
Blau, P. M. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9780203792643 · Cited by 15,923
Exchange and Power in Social Life.
Bierstedt, R., & Blau, P. M. (1965) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091154 · Cited by 13,625
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Hammer, T. H., Anderson, J. F., Gurdon, M. A., Jick, T. D., Petit, A., Stern, R. N., Schwartz, H., Vardi, Y., & Dunnette, M. D. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391755 · Cited by 11,947
Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.4.422 · Cited by 11,335
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 10,023
Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium
Hayes, A. F. (2009) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750903310360 · Cited by 9,757
Healthy work: stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-0381 · Cited by 8,163
Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4 · Cited by 7,806
Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature.
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698 · Cited by 7,592
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Klein, K. J., & Ralls, R. S. (1997). The unintended organizational consequences of technology training: Implications for training theory, research, and practice. In J. K. Ford, S. Kozlowski, K. Kraiger, E. Salas, & M. Teachout (Eds.), Improving training effectiveness in organizations (pp. 323–354). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trenerry, B., Chng, S., Wang, Y., Suhaila, Z. S., Lim, S. S., Lu, H. Y., & Oh, P. H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620766 · Cited by 930
Internet of Things and Big Data as enablers for business digitalization strategies
Sestino, A., Prete, M. I., Piper, L., & Guido, G. (2020) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102173 · Cited by 564
Maan, A. T., Abid, G., Butt, T. H., Ashfaq, F., & Ahmed, S. (2020) · Future Business Journal · doi:10.1186/s43093-020-00027-8 · Cited by 397
Li, J.-Y., Sun, R., Tao, W., & Lee, Y. (2020) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101984 · Cited by 354
Employee Adaptive Performance and Its Antecedents: Review and Synthesis
Park, S., & Park, S. (2019) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484319836315 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Cullen, K. L., Edwards, B. D., Casper, W. C., & Gue, K. R.
- Affiliations
- Center for Creative Leadership (US)
- Oklahoma State University (US)
- Auburn University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cullen, Kristin L.
- Edwards, Bryan D.
- Casper, Wm. Camron
- Gue, Kevin R.
- Venue
- Journal of Business and Psychology
- Published
- 2013-06-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 269-280
- ISSN
- 0889-3268 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-353X
- OpenAlex
- W2104543012
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 18.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Business and Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Change
- Keywords
- employee adaptability, perceived organizational support, job satisfaction, employee performance, organizational change, stressor-strain relationship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review