Cited by 17Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Using computational models of learning to advance cognitive behavioral therapy

Open access
Berwian, Isabel M., Hitchock, Peter, Pisupati, Sashank, Schoen, Gila, Niv, Yael·2025·Communications Psychology

Abstract

Many psychotherapy interventions have a large evidence base and can help a substantial number of people with symptoms of mental health conditions. However, we still have little understanding of why treatments work. Early advances in psychotherapy, such as the development of exposure therapy, built on theoretical and experimental evidence from Pavlovian and instrumental conditioning. More generally, all psychotherapy achieves change through learning. The past 25 years have seen substantial developments in computational models of learning, with increased computational precision and a focus on multiple learning mechanisms and their interaction. Now might be a good time to formalize psychotherapy interventions as computational models of learning to improve our understanding of mechanisms of change in psychotherapy. To advance research and help bring together a new joint field of theory-driven computational psychotherapy, we first review literature on cognitive behavioral therapy (exposure therapy and cognitive restructuring) and introduce computational models of reinforcement learning and representation learning. We then suggest a mapping of these learning algorithms on change processes presumably underlying the effects of exposure therapy and cognitive restructuring. Finally, we outline how the understanding of interventions through the lens of learning algorithms can inform intervention research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s44271-025-00251-4

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human behavior is currently considered as the result of interaction of two learning lines: model-free reinforcement learning and model-based learning.

    “В настоящее время поведение человека рассматривается как результат взаимодействия двух линий обучения -обучение с подкреплением без модели (model-free), которое опирается на накопление наблюдаемой обратной связи об исходах взаимодействия со средой, и обучение с моделью (model-based), при котором человек активно проверяет свои гипотезы о внутреннем устройстве среды и делает выводы о скрытых причинн”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 91 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [8]Beck, J. S. & Beck, A. T. Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Basics and Beyond (The Guilford Press, 2020).
  2. [37]Wolpe, J. Psychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition. xiv, 239 (Stanford University Press, 1958).
  3. [51]Schramm, E., Penberthy, J. K. & Jr, J. P. M. CBASP as a Distinctive Treatment for Persistent Depressive Disorder: Distinctive Features (Routledge, 2014).
  4. [52]Beck, A. T. Depression: Causes and Treatment (University of Pennsylvania Press, 1967). In this book, Beck provides an overview of his highly influential cognitive theories of depression, and the experimental evidence that supports the theory and development of cognitive therapy.
  5. [54]Beck, A. T. The Diagnosis and Management of Depression. (University of Pennsylvania Press, 1973).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berwian, I. M., Hitchock, P., Pisupati, S., Schoen, G., & Niv, Y.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Geha Mental Health Center (IL)
Corresponding author
Berwian, Isabel M.
Venue
Communications Psychology
Published
2025-04-27
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
72-72
ISSN
2731-9121 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4409849574
Cited by
16
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Multi-Channel Psych Program, Wellcome Leap
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
computational models of learning, cognitive behavioral therapy, mechanisms of change, exposure therapy, cognitive restructuring, reinforcement learning, representation learning, psychotherapeutic interventions, learning algorithms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review