Cited by 17Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAttachment and Relationship DynamicsMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

The Before Baby Relationship Checkup: A Couples-Based Intervention to Reduce Relationship Risk Factors for Perinatal Mood and Anxiety Disorders

Darling, Ellen V., Byatt, Nancy, Maher, Emily L., Gray, Tatiana D., Simas, Tiffany A. Moore, Cordova, James V.·2022·Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

Abstract

Relationship conflict and lack of partner support are risk factors for perinatal mood and anxiety disorders. An intervention to strengthen couples' relationships before birth may reduce relationship risk factors for perinatal mood and anxiety disorders, though no research has explored this to date. The aims of this Stage 1 open-series non-experimental proof of concept study were to adapt the 'Marriage Checkup', an evidence-based intervention for relationship distress, as a preventative intervention for perinatal mood and anxiety disorders and to assess its feasibility and acceptability. Pregnant women receiving care at a university-based obstetric practice, and their partners, were recruited. Ten couples participated in the Before Baby Relationship Checkup, a personalized relationship health service offered in the obstetric clinic. Quantitative and qualitative data gathered suggests the intervention is feasible to implement in an obstetric setting, and acceptable to perinatal couples. Specific adaptations to the Marriage Checkup for perinatal couples are warranted and further testing is needed to evaluate efficacy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10880-021-09819-8

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Darling, E. V., Byatt, N., Maher, E. L., Gray, T. D., Simas, T. A. M., & Cordova, J. V.
Affiliations
  • Clark University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Darling, Ellen V.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
Published
2021-10-06
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
295-309
ISSN
  • 1068-9583 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3572
OpenAlex
W3204219875
Cited by
17
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Clark Digital Commons (Clark University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
perinatal mood and anxiety disorders, couple-based interventions, relationship conflict, partner support, preventive interventions, pregnant women, obstetric care, feasibility and acceptability, relational health
MeSH terms
Affect, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Parturition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review