Cited by 30Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

The impact of acceptance and commitment therapy on positive parenting strategies among parents who have experienced relationship violence

Moyer, Danielle N., Page, Amy R., McMakin, Darby Q., Murrell, Amy R., Lester, Ethan G., Walker, Haley A.·2018·Journal of Family Violence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10896-018-9956-5

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moyer, D. N., Page, A. R., McMakin, D. Q., Murrell, A. R., Lester, E. G., & Walker, H. A.
Affiliations
University of North Texas (US)
Corresponding author
Moyer, Danielle N.
Venue
Journal of Family Violence
Published
2018-02-26
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
269-279
ISSN
  • 0885-7482 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2851
OpenAlex
W2791839880
Cited by
30
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Family Violence (publishedVersion)
Funders
Hogg Foundation for Mental Health (GP6138)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, positive parenting, relationship violence, intimate partner violence, psychological flexibility, parental distress, brief psychotherapy, mediation, treatment retention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review